The US stock market has been on a tear, yet the country’s economy is in the dumps. So why do so many people believe — undoubtedly incorrectly — that the stock market has decoupled from reality?
The economy many people experience, while bleak, is local, personal and, for the most part, either not publicly traded or plays only a small part in the stock market’s moves. To explain why these personal experiences have so little effect on equity markets, we must look more closely at the market role of the weakest industry sectors.
The surprising conclusion: The most visible and economically vulnerable industries are also among the smallest, based on their market-capitalization weight in major indices such as the S&P 500. Markets, it turns out, are not especially vulnerable to highly visible, but relatively tiny industries.
Photo: Reuters
The 30 most economically damaged industry categories could be delisted before tomorrow’s market open, and it would hardly shave more than a few percentage points off the S&P 500.
This is so despite the worst US economic collapse since the Great Depression. All of the economic data are so bad that figures on GDP, unemployment and initial jobless claims must be re-scaled to even fit on charts.
However, the US economy is not the stock market and vice versa. Ignoring overseas strength is a major oversight. The so-called FAANG — Facebook Inc, Apple Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Netflix Inc and Google parent Alphabet Inc — along with Microsoft Corp, derive about half — and in some cases even more — of their revenue from abroad.
Beyond that, the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in the US has benefited the giant tech companies’ sales and profits. No wonder the NASDAQ Composite 100 Index, which is dominated by big tech companies, is up about 26 percent this year.
However, a reasonable person might argue that GDP fell by about one-third in the second quarter and the S&P 500 should be in synch with that.
What is more, of the 500 companies in the S&P 500, about 450 of them are doing terribly. Industries such as retail, travel, energy, entertainment and dining have seen sales evaporate.
Bankruptcies are piling up — legendary retailer Lord & Taylor is just the latest — and more are surely coming. Yet, the S&P 500, after a huge plunge in March, is up 2 percent this year.
Market capitalization explains why.
Start with some of this year’s worst-performing industries: As of the end of last month, these include department stores, down 62.6 percent; airlines, off 55 percent; travel services, down 51.4 percent; oil and gas equipment and services, down 50.5 percent; resorts and casinos, down 45.4 percent; and hotel and motel real-estate investment trusts, off 41.9 percent. The next 15 industry sectors in the index are down between 30.5 percent and 41.7 percent. That is four months after the market rebounded from the lows of late March.
These are highly visible industries, with companies that are well-covered by the news media with household names known to many consumers. Retailers are everywhere we go. Gas stations, chain restaurants and hotels are ubiquitous in cities and suburbs across the country.
So although high visibility industries might be of considerable significance to the economy, they are not very significant to the capitalization-weighted stock market indices.
Consider how little these beaten-up sectors mentioned above affect the indices. Department stores might have fallen 62.3 percent, but on a market-cap basis they are a mere 0.01 percent of the S&P 500. Airlines are larger, but not much: They weigh in at 0.18 percent of the index. The story is the same for travel services, hotel and motel real-estate investment trusts, and resorts and casinos.
The market is telling us that these industries just do not matter very much to stock market performance.
And the sectors that do matter? Consider that just four industry groups — Internet content, software infrastructure, consumer electronics and Internet retailers — account for more than US$8 trillion in market value, or almost one-quarter of total US stock market value of about US$35 trillion.
Take the 10 biggest technology companies in the S&P 500 and weight them equally, and they would be up more than 37 percent for the year. Do the same for the next 490 names in the index, and they are down about 7.7 percent. That shows just how much a few giant matter to the index.
On some level, it is completely understandable why many people believe that markets are no longer tethered to reality, because the performance does not correspond to their personal experience, which is one of job loss, economic hardship and personal despair.
However, what is important to understand is that indices based on market-cap weighting can be — as they are now — driven by the gains of just a handful of companies.
We can argue about whether the way the market reacts is good or bad and never reach a satisfying conclusion.
However, one thing the market is not is irrational or disconnected from is the reality of market capitalization, and its impact on stock indices.
Barry Ritholtz is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is chairman and chief investment officer of Ritholtz Wealth Management and was previously chief market strategist at Maxim Group. He is the author of Bailout Nation.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves fell below the US$600 billion mark at the end of last month, with the central bank reporting a total of US$596.89 billion — a decline of US$8.6 billion from February — ending a three-month streak of increases. The central bank attributed the drop to a combination of factors such as outflows by foreign institutional investors, currency fluctuations and its own market interventions. “The large-scale outflows disrupted the balance of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market, prompting the central bank to intervene repeatedly by selling US dollars to stabilize the local currency,” Department of Foreign
ENERGY ISSUES: The TSIA urged the government to increase natural gas and helium reserves to reduce the impact of the Middle East war on semiconductor supply stability Chip testing and packaging service provider ASE Technology Holding Co (日月光投控) yesterday said it planned to invest more than NT$100 billion (US$3.15 billion) in building a new advanced chip testing facility in Kaohsiung to keep up with customer demand driven by the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. That would be included in the company’s capital expenditure budget next year, ASE said. There is also room to raise this year’s capital spending budget from a record-high US$7 billion estimated three months ago, it added. ASE would have six factories under construction this year, another record-breaking number, ASE chief operating officer Tien Wu
Intel Corp is joining Elon Musk’s long-shot effort to develop semiconductors for Tesla Inc, Space Exploration Technologies Corp and xAI, marking a surprising twist in the chipmaker’s comeback bid. Intel would help the Terafab project “refactor” the technology in a chip factory, the company said on Tuesday in a post on X, Musk’s social media platform. That is a stage in the development process that typically helps make chips more powerful or reliable. The chipmaker’s shares jumped 4.2 percent to US$52.91 in New York trading on Tuesday. The Terafab project is a grand plan by Musk to eventually manufacture his own chips for
For weeks now, the global tech industry has been waiting for a major artificial intelligence (AI) launch from DeepSeek (深度求索), seen as a benchmark for China’s progress in the fast-moving field. More than a year has passed since the start-up put Chinese AI on the map in early last year with a low-cost chatbot that performed at a similar level to US rivals. However, despite reports and rumors about its imminent release, DeepSeek’s next-generation “V4” model is nowhere in sight. Speculation is also swirling over the geopolitical implications of which computer chips were chosen to train and power the new
RSS