Sun, Jul 26, 2020 page16

• Intel’s ‘stunning failure’ heralds end of era for US chip sector

  The firm’s announcement that it might outsource chips raises security questions for the US, but it is a boon for TSMC, which is years ahead of Intel in terms of technology, an analyst said

  • By Ian King / Bloomberg
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Intel Corp’s decision to consider outsourcing manufacturing heralds the end of an era in which the company, and the US, dominated the semiconductor industry. The move could reverberate well beyond Silicon Valley, influencing global trade and geopolitics.

  The Santa Clara, California-based company has been the largest chipmaker for most of the past 30 years by combining the best designs with cutting-edge factories, several of which are still based in the US.

  Most other US chip companies shut or sold domestic plants years ago, and had other firms make the components, mostly in Asia. Intel held out, arguing that doing both improved each side of its operation and created better semiconductors.

  

  Intel Corp chief executive officer Bob Swan delivers a speech at the CES in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Jan. 6.

  Photo: EPA-EFE

  That strategy is in tatters now, with the company’s factories struggling to keep up with the latest 7-nanometer production process.

  After chief executive officer Bob Swan said Intel is considering outsourcing, the company’s shares slumped 16 percent on Friday, the most since March, when the stock market plummeted in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

  “We view the roadmap missteps to be a stunning failure for a company once known for flawless execution, and could well represent the end of Intel’s computing dominance,” Raymond James Financial analyst Chris Caso wrote in a research note on Friday.

  Swan has said that where a semiconductor is made is not that important.

  However, domestic chip production has become a national priority for China, and some US politicians and national security experts consider sending this technical know-how overseas to be a potentially dangerous mistake.

  “We’ve seen how vulnerable we are,” US Senator John Cornyn said last month, when US lawmakers proposed an estimated US$25 billion in funding and tax credits to strengthen domestic semiconductor production.

  Intel’s Xeon chips run computers and data centers that support the design of nuclear power stations, spacecraft and jets, while helping governments quickly understand intelligence and other crucial information.

  Many of these processors are made at facilities in Oregon, Arizona and New Mexico.

  If Intel outsources this work, it would likely be done by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), which focuses on production and is currently the world leader.

  “With the latest push out of process technology, we believe that Intel has zero-to-no chance of catching or surpassing TSMC at least for the next half-decade, if not ever,” Susquehanna analyst Chris Rolland wrote in a research note.

  He said Intel should sell its plants to TSMC, although he added that is unlikely.

  Over the years, Intel has spent tens of billions of US dollars updating its factories, and all of Swan’s predecessors touted them as a crucial advantage that kept the company ahead of the rest of the industry. As the largest chip producer, Intel benefited from economies of scale and attracted the most experienced engineers and scientists.

  The rise of smartphones and other mobile devices changed all that. Intel dabbled in mobile chips, but never committed its best production and design to the area, preferring to prioritize its existing PC and server chip businesses.

  When smartphone sales took off, phone makers used other processors from companies such as Qualcomm Inc or they designed their own, like Apple Inc — and TSMC factories churned these components out.

  While Intel makes hundreds of millions of chips a year now, TSMC produces more than a billion annually. That has given the Taiwanese company more experience to improve its factories, helping TSMC’s engineers overtake their Intel counterparts in technical execution.

  Swan on Friday said that Intel’s products are still the best, despite the manufacturing delays.

  However, by opening the door to outsourcing, he endangers one of the last bastions of US technology leadership.

  “By outsourcing leading edge technology, presumably to TSMC, Intel would give up what has been its main source of competitive advantage for 50 years,” Caso said.

  Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Five politicians charged with graft

  • 2

    Tsai pledges to defend ROC’s airspace

  • 3

    Swedish MP calls for name change to Taipei office

  • 4

    Travel rules eased if no symptoms

  • 5

    Taipei authorities tipped off about illegal facility