Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生) yesterday agreed to reassess the metrics used in deciding the nation’s feed-in tariff (FIT) for renewable energy.
Following a heated public hearing with solar power industry representatives in Taipei, Tseng said that the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) could improve its assessment of the FIT, which it had based on a report that the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER, 台灣經濟研究院) had been commissioned to conduct at a cost of more than NT$20 million (US$649,140).
The assessment metric relies on receipts and does not fully reflect the true cost of solar projects, industry representatives said yesterday, with many tipping their hat to protesters in Paris by donning yellow reflective vests.
“Moving forward, the ministry will hold separate public hearings to iron out conflicting views on the processes for selecting solar project receipts,” Tseng told reporters on the sidelines of the hearing, following criticism that the TIER report was flawed and based on questionable data.
“Still, many are calling for a FIT cut as the cost of solar energy and its setup costs drop around the globe,” Tseng said.
Falling solar energy prices were the result of China’s so-called “May 31 New Policy,” which has exacerbated the dumping of solar modules worldwide, while prices have remained relatively unchanged in Taiwan, PV Generation System Association head Eric Kuo (郭宣甫) said.
While money could be saved by using Chinese imports, the government should support locally made products, Kuo added.
A stable FIT would help local producers weather the price slump, which should subside in the near future, Kuo said.
Separately, Star Energy Corp (星能), a subcontractor for onshore deliverables, said at a public hearing for the wind energy industry that the FIT cut had begun to cause foreign developers to consider pulling out of Taiwan.
The government’s cut is too severe and does not reflect the costs of meeting Taiwan’s higher construction expenses due to climatic and geological conditions, in addition to local content requirements, foreign wind energy developers said.
While Taiwan has proposed to cut the FIT by 12.7 percent to NT$5.106 per unit over the next 20 years, France is offering rates equivalent to between NT$5.3 and NT$7.2 without local content requirements, Wpd Taiwan Energy Co Ltd (達德能源) said.
The ministry’s plan to cap the government’s purchase of offshore wind-generated energy to 3,600 operating hours per year would also deter companies from deploying the latest turbine technology, Wpd Taiwan said, adding that a cap of 72,000 operating hours per year should be set for the next two decades.
Orsted A/S said that the rate cut, implemented at such an early stage, would prevent Taiwan’s offshore wind projects from maturing and delivering clean energy at low prices once they enter the auction bidding phase.
A period of development helped by a stable FIT is required before offshore wind energy becomes cheaper, offshore wind energy developers said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
RSS