It was “Lehman Weekend.” The moment in September 2008 when the 150-year-old investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc collapsed, precipitating the worst global economic crisis since the 1930s.
After failing to find buyers for the troubled financial giant, which was weighed down by risky debt holdings made up of subprime mortgages, US authorities declined to offer a bailout and allowed the institution to fail.
On Sept. 15, 2008, at 1:45am, Lehman Brothers took the world by surprise when it filed for bankruptcy, leaving more than US$600 billion in debt, as well as 25,000 employees in shock.
Photo: EPA-EFE
It was the biggest bankruptcy in US history. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones plunged 500 points, the largest drop since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Stunned traders streaming out of the building carrying boxes of their belongings became a symbol of the crisis.
Some were caught by surprise, but others, like Lawrence McDonald, a former trader and co-author of a 2009 book on the collapse — A Colossal Failure of Common Sense: The Incredible Inside Story of the Collapse of Lehman Brothers — said that management had long been alerted to the excessive risks it took to increase short-term profits.
The top Lehman leadership, housed on the bank’s 31st floor, “drove us 162 miles an hour ... right into the biggest subprime iceberg ever seen,” he said in 2009.
“It was 24,992 people making money and eight guys losing it,” he said, lamenting that the management “bet the ranch” on toxic assets.
From 2005 to 2007, at the height of the real-estate bubble, when mortgages were given to many homebuyers who could not afford them, and then packaged into securities and sold off, Lehman Brothers bought several mortgage brokerages and posted record profits.
However, in mid-2007, the losses began to build. The knockout punch came nine months later, on March 16, 2008, with the near bankruptcy of another investment bank, Bear Stearns Cos.
Bear Stearns was on the verge of bankruptcy also because of its massive bets on subprime mortgage securities, and was bought for a pittance by JPMorgan Chase & Co, in a sale brokered by the US Federal Reserve. The deal shook markets, which started betting on Lehman’s demise.
The Fed and the US Department of the Treasury tried to find a buyer, negotiating in vain with a South Korean bank, then with Bank of America Corp and Barclays PLC.
However, while the government just a week earlier took over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — government-sponsored private enterprises that guarantee more than US$5 trillion in home loans — in the end, officials chose to abandon Lehman.
A few days later, Uncle Sam would rescue insurance giant American International Group Inc (AIG) for US$180 billion, before providing another US$700 billion dollar in a controversial recapitalization plan to prop up banks — the Troubled Asset Relief Program — to try to shore up the teetering financial system.
Authorities found themselves between a rock and a hard place, and have been widely criticized for sacrificing Lehman Brothers, but saving other banks, such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
“The thing we get the most criticism for is letting Lehman go down,” said Henry Paulson, who served as secretary of the treasury under US president George W. Bush and was at the helm at the start of the crisis.
“Many people say well they were able to save Bear Stearns, they were able to save AIG, why couldn’t they save Lehman? We answer it and most people don’t believe us,” he told US National Public Radio.
Officials concluded that Lehman was so weak and had so little collateral that a bailout would be simply unworkable.
Timothy Geithner, who led the New York Fed during that time and later became secretary of the Treasury under then-US president Barack Obama, said thatofficials had very few options.
“Lehman was terribly weak even relative to the other weaker institutions in this context. The world was terrifically fragile,” he told NPR. “It was very hard to find someone strong enough in that moment of peril that was going to be capable of taking on the vast bulk of that risk.”
However, others, including Laurence Ball, head of the economics department at Johns Hopkins University, said in a 2016 report on Lehman that the reasons given do not add up and it was more likely there was political pressure on the Fed to allow the bank to fail.
“Another factor is that both Paulson and Fed officials, although worried about the effects of a Lehman failure, did not fully anticipate the damage that it would cause,” Ball said.
LIMITED MEASURES: The proposed restrictions on Chinese chip exports are weaker than previously considered, following lobbying by major US firms, sources said US President Joe Biden’s administration is weighing additional curbs on sales of semiconductor equipment and artificial intelligence (AI) memory chips to China that would escalate the US crackdown on Beijing’s tech ambitions, but stop short of some stricter measures previously considered, said sources familiar with the matter. The restrictions could be unveiled as soon as next week, said the sources, who emphasized that the timing and contours of the rules have changed several times, and that nothing is final until they are published. The measures follow months of deliberations by US officials, negotiations with allies in Japan and the Netherlands, and
Qualcomm Inc’s interest in pursuing an acquisition of Intel Corp has cooled, people familiar with the matter said, upending what would have likely been one of the largest technology deals of all time. The complexities associated with acquiring all of Intel has made a deal less attractive to Qualcomm, said some of the people, asking not to be identified discussing confidential matters. It is always possible Qualcomm looks at pieces of Intel instead or rekindles its interest later, they added. Representatives for Qualcomm and Intel declined to comment. Qualcomm made a preliminary approach to Intel on a possible takeover, Bloomberg News and other media
Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) yesterday said it expects any impact of new tariffs from US president-elect Donald Trump to hit the company less than its rivals, citing its global manufacturing footprint. Young Liu (劉揚偉), chairman of the contract manufacturer and key Apple Inc supplier, told reporters after a forum in Taipei that it saw the primary impact of any fresh tariffs falling on its clients because its business model is based on contract manufacturing. “Clients may decide to shift production locations, but looking at Foxconn’s global footprint, we are ahead. As a result, the impact on us is likely smaller compared to
‘NO WINNER’: Experts said that Mexico’s and Canada’s ability to walk away from the threats Trump made is limited, while some tariffs on China are likely to go into effect US president-elect Donald Trump on Monday said he intends to impose sweeping tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada and China, prompting a swift warning from Beijing that “no one will win a trade war.” In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump vowed to hit some of the US’ largest trading partners with duties on all goods entering the country. “On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25 percent tariff on ALL products coming into the United States,” he wrote. In another post, Trump said he
RSS