Wed, Sep 12, 2018 - Page 9 News List

Vladimir Putin’s wars abroad take heavy toll on Russians’ welfare

By Anders Aslund

Wars are expensive, as the Russian people are now learning. The Kremlin is pursuing military adventures in eastern Ukraine and Syria, and although these conflicts are limited in scope, one wonders if the country can really afford them.

As the world’s 11th-largest economy, Russia can manage in the short term, but the long term is quite another matter.

From 2008 to 2016, Russia increased its military expenditures from 3.3 percent of GDP — which roughly corresponds to the current US level — to 5.3 percent, according to the authoritative Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

According to the Russian government’s own fiscal statistics — which remain surprisingly open — its civilian expenditures in occupied Crimea come to about US$2 billion per year.

While there are no public data on its presence in eastern Ukraine, it is safe to assume that the costs there are about the same, in which case Russia is spending US$4 billion per year — 0.3 percent of GDP — on these two operations alone.

Yet, beyond military expenditures, Russia is also incurring the costs of lost trade and investment, as well as escalating sanctions, which are more than enough to condemn the country to stagnation for as long as its wars last.

In July 2014, the US and the EU imposed sanctions on Russia’s finance, oil and gas, and defense technologies sectors in response to its military aggression in Ukraine’s Donbas region.

So far, the measures have been effective. In global finance, the US dollar is king. And because every dollar passes through US banks, dollar transactions are ultimately subject to the US Department of the Treasury’s jurisdiction. Through financial sanctions, the US can thus starve Russia of foreign investment.

In August 2015, the IMF estimated that Western sanctions would immediately reduce Russia’s real (inflation-adjusted) GDP by 1 to 1.5 percent.

However, in the medium term, the IMF concluded that sanctions “could lead to a cumulative output loss ... of up to 9 percent of GDP, as lower capital accumulation and technological transfers weaken already declining productivity growth.”

After being cut off from the dollar, Russian corporations have had no choice but to pay off debt as it comes due. As a result, Russia’s total foreign debt declined from US$732 billion in June 2014 to US$519 billion in December 2015 and it has stayed near that level ever since.

Similarly, Russia’s international currency reserves declined from US$510 billion at the end of 2013 to a low of US$356 billion in March 2015. Since then, they have recovered to US$458 billion, owing to Russia’s persistent and large current-account surplus.

However, from 2015 to last year, foreign direct investment in Russia amounted to less than 2 percent of GDP per year on average — almost half what it had been in the preceding years — reflecting not just falling investment, but also reduced technology imports.

Through all of this, Russia has managed to maintain macroeconomic stability and external balances, but it has suffered a minor decline in output and a major decline in the standard of living.

During the four sanction years from 2014 to last year, real disposable incomes plunged by 17 percent, and investment slumped by 12 percent, although GDP fell by only 0.5 percent.

Meanwhile, Russia and Ukraine have been imposing escalating trade sanctions on each another. As a result, their mutual trade fell by 80 percent between 2012 and 2016.

This story has been viewed 2820 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top