Top US officials said on Sunday more steps may be needed to firm up economic recovery — including extended jobless benefits — and declined to rule out future tax increases to tame massive budget deficits.
US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the government needed to show the will to reverse deficits after the recovery and would have to make some “hard choices” about whether this may include increasing tax revenues.
“We have to bring them down to a level where the amount we’re borrowing from the world is stable at a reasonable level,” Geithner said on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. “And that’s going to require some very hard choices. And we’re going to have to do that in a way that does not add unfairly to the burdens that the average American already faces.”
Asked if he could rule out new taxes, Geithner said: “I think what the country needs to do is to understand that we will do what it takes” to bring deficits down.
Republicans have voiced concerns about the White House’s stimulus-related spending and health care reform plans producing trillion-dollar deficits for years to come and eventually sapping US economic vitality.
“We have put trillions of additional debt on future generations of Americans,” Republican Senator John McCain said.
Top White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers later said Geithner was not laying the groundwork for tax increases, and added that none of the White House proposals would burden the middle class. But he, too, declined to rule out raising taxes as a means to control deficits.
“It’s never a good idea to absolutely rule things out no matter what, but what the president has been completely clear on is this: That he is not going to pursue any of his priorities, not health care, not energy — nothing — in ways that are primarily burdening middle-class families,” Summers said. “That is something that is not going to happen.”
There were signs the economy is starting to improve, Geithner said, but “we have a ways to go” before it starts growing enough to create jobs again.
Although economic forecasters expect output to turn positive in the second half of this year, Geithner said as that happens the pace of job losses will slow materially.
“As you go into 2010, we can’t just limp out of this thing. We need to be growing robustly to make sure that the unemployment rate comes down,” Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council on Economic Advisers, said on CNN.
The administration of US President Barack Obama may have to look at extending unemployment benefits toward the end of the year to deal with the jobless rate and the looming expiration of aid to more than a million unemployed.
“I think that is something that the administration and Congress are going to look very carefully,” Geithner said.
He can count on some Republican support. Republican Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina told Fox News Sunday he would “definitely support” extension of aid to the unemployed.
Summers, asked if the US needed a second fiscal stimulus program, said the Obama administration was focused on executing the US$787 billion spending plan passed in February.
Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said on ABC strengthening confidence in the economy could be dashed if home prices were to take another turn downward. He said he didn’t believe that a steep drop was in store, but home prices had stabilized only temporarily.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say