The US and the EU filed separate unfair-trade cases against China on Tuesday, accusing it of favoring domestic industry by limiting exports of materials needed to produce steel, aluminum and other products.
Beijing defended its curbs as an effort to protect the environment and said they comply with China’s WTO commitments.
Analysts expect the fight over China’s export restrictions will be just one of many trade cases US President Barack Obama’s administration files against China. Obama made campaign pledges to take a tougher approach with US trading partners in the face of soaring job losses and the longest US recession since World War II.
The materials at issue include coke, bauxite, magnesium and silicon metal, the US complaint says.
The US and EU complaints filed with the Geneva-based WTO say China’s export restrictions give its companies an unfair edge over their foreign rivals by giving them access to cheaper materials, despite WTO rules against export curbs.
US Trade Representative Ron Kirk said the Obama administration decided to pursue a WTO case after two years of talks between the Chinese and the Bush administration had failed to reach a resolution. He said China’s actions were endangering US jobs.
“The United States believes that China is unfairly restricting exports of raw materials,” Kirk said. “These actions are hurting American steel, aluminum and chemical manufacturers, among other industries, that desperately need these material to make their products.”
Beijing said it hoped to resolve the dispute through dialogue in the WTO.
“The goal of the Chinese side’s policy on the relevant exports is to protect the environment and natural resources, and the Chinese side considers the relevant policy to be compliant with WTO regulations,” the Ministry of Commerce said in a written statement.
The ministry yesterday said that Beijing has filed its own complaint asking the WTO to investigate a US ban on imports of Chinese poultry.
The US and EU complaints trigger a 60-day consultation period.
If the dispute is not resolved, they can formally request a WTO hearing panel. At that point, the cases likely would be merged.
If the US and EU prevail at a WTO hearing — a process that can take up to a year — and China still refuses to lift the export restrictions, the two would be given a go-ahead to impose economic sanctions on China. Those sanctions would be equal to the harm inflicted on their companies by Beijing’s actions.
“The United States has a strong case,” said Dan Griswold, a trade economist at the Cato Institute, a Washington think tank. “And it certainly adds weight to the US case that the two largest trading entities in the WTO have joined together. That should get China’s attention.”
Officials from the US and EU sought to protect their domestic companies’ collective ability to compete on a global scale.
The American Iron and Steel Institute — whose members include Nucor Corp and United States Steel Corp — the United Steel Workers and other industry groups released a joint statement praising the administration’s decision to pursue a WTO case against China.
“When China joined the WTO in 2001, it committed to removing these restrictions,” the groups said.
They called the barriers on the export of raw materials and minerals “just another way in which China favors its domestic manufacturing industries at the expense of the rest of the world.”
STILL COMMITTED: The US opposes any forced change to the ‘status quo’ in the Strait, but also does not seek conflict, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said US President Donald Trump’s administration released US$5.3 billion in previously frozen foreign aid, including US$870 million in security exemptions for programs in Taiwan, a list of exemptions reviewed by Reuters showed. Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid shortly after taking office on Jan. 20, halting funding for everything from programs that fight starvation and deadly diseases to providing shelters for millions of displaced people across the globe. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has said that all foreign assistance must align with Trump’s “America First” priorities, issued waivers late last month on military aid to Israel and Egypt, the
France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and accompanying warships were in the Philippines yesterday after holding combat drills with Philippine forces in the disputed South China Sea in a show of firepower that would likely antagonize China. The Charles de Gaulle on Friday docked at Subic Bay, a former US naval base northwest of Manila, for a break after more than two months of deployment in the Indo-Pacific region. The French carrier engaged with security allies for contingency readiness and to promote regional security, including with Philippine forces, navy ships and fighter jets. They held anti-submarine warfare drills and aerial combat training on Friday in
COMBAT READINESS: The military is reviewing weaponry, personnel resources, and mobilization and recovery forces to adjust defense strategies, the defense minister said The military has released a photograph of Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) appearing to sit beside a US general during the annual Han Kuang military exercises on Friday last week in a historic first. In the photo, Koo, who was presiding over the drills with high-level officers, appears to be sitting next to US Marine Corps Major General Jay Bargeron, the director of strategic planning and policy of the US Indo-Pacific Command, although only Bargeron’s name tag is visible in the seat as “J5 Maj General.” It is the first time the military has released a photo of an active
CHANGE OF MIND: The Chinese crew at first showed a willingness to cooperate, but later regretted that when the ship arrived at the port and refused to enter Togolese Republic-registered Chinese freighter Hong Tai (宏泰號) and its crew have been detained on suspicion of deliberately damaging a submarine cable connecting Taiwan proper and Penghu County, the Coast Guard Administration said in a statement yesterday. The case would be subject to a “national security-level investigation” by the Tainan District Prosecutors’ Office, it added. The administration said that it had been monitoring the ship since 7:10pm on Saturday when it appeared to be loitering in waters about 6 nautical miles (11km) northwest of Tainan’s Chiang Chun Fishing Port, adding that the ship’s location was about 0.5 nautical miles north of the No.