Australia’s competition watchdog said yesterday it would not oppose the Aluminum Corp of China’s (Chinalco, 中國鋁業) plan to double its stake in debt-laden miner Rio Tinto because the deal probably would not give the companies unfair influence over global iron ore prices.
The deal may yet be scuttled by Australia’s government on national interest grounds, but the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) will give the US$19.5 billion bid a boost after weeks of trouble.
Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board announced earlier this month it wanted another 90 days to scrutinize the deal before it makes a recommendation to Australian Treasurer Wayne Swan, who is under rising political pressure to block it because it would sell Australian assets to owners overseas.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
The commission ran a parallel review of the deal to assess its potential effects on competition, and said yesterday it had decided not to oppose it.
“The ACCC concluded that Chinalco and Rio Tinto would be unlikely to have the ability to unilaterally decrease global iron ore prices below competitive levels,” the commission said in a statement.
Chinalco is offering to invest US$12.3 billion in joint investments in aluminum, copper and ore mining with Rio Tinto, and to spend US$7.2 billion on convertible bonds in the company.
If redeemed for shares the bonds would almost double Chinalco’s existing 9.3 percent stake in Rio Tinto Group to 18 percent.
The Anglo-Australian miner’s board has backed the deal, which will help it deal with about US$40 billion in debt, mostly attributable to its purchase of Canadian aluminum producer Alcan Inc in 2007.
London-based Rio Tinto is the world’s third-largest miner but has been slashing production and jobs worldwide to lower its debt as the global financial crisis sharply erodes demand and prices.
The commission said it came to its decision after considering the “potential for vertical integration between Rio Tinto’s Australian iron ore operations and Chinese steel makers, based on the assumption that Chinalco and various steel makers are subsidiaries of the same parent entity and therefore have common commercial interests.”
The deal also faces a Senate inquiry that will examine opponents’ claims that it should be blocked because it would sell off Australian assets to a foreign government.
Swan has said the government welcomes foreign investment in Australia but that the Chinalco deal will only go ahead if it is in the national interest.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS