AFP, NICE, France
The crisis roiling the financial sector will probably grind on for some time, but European banks should be able to avert serious trouble, EU finance chiefs said.
US investment bank Lehman Brothers’ fight for its very survival over the weekend highlighted just how fragile the sector remains more than one year after the crisis first broke.
PHOTO: AP
“Everybody who was saying for the last few weeks that the light was at the end of the tunnel have had the surprise of finding a locomotive bearing down on them,” German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck said on Saturday.
With no end in sight to the crisis, the stability of the financial sector figured high on the agenda of a two-day meeting of EU finance ministers and central bankers in the French Riviera city of Nice.
“This financial crisis will be on our agenda for a great number of months to come,” Luxembourg Finance Minister Jean-Claude Juncker said on Friday, after the ministers debated Europe’s preparations for banking sector turbulence.
“I am really convinced that we are not at the end of the financial crisis,” said Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup of finance ministers from the 15 euro countries and is also Luxembourg’s prime minister.
German central bank Governor Axel Weber said that the crisis engulfing Lehman Brothers marked “another round of tension in the markets” after the collapse of Bear Stearns earlier this year.
“The situation remains fragile, with the key credit markets disrupted and the banking sector under pressure,” EU Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said.
The travails of big US financial institutions like Lehman Brothers, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae has focused the minds of Europe’s finance chiefs on whether they are prepared to react in case a major European bank also runs into serious trouble.
Although national governments have their own plans in case a local bank hits the rocks, Europe still lacks a prepared response in case of problems at a big pan-European bank.
European financial regulators have failed to keep up with the waves of cross-border consolidation in the banking industry sector in recent years, leaving banks largely supervised along national lines.
That leaves big European banks like Deutsche Bank, Unicredit or BNP Paribas facing a hodge-podge of regulations across Europe, which officials fear could be a burden if ever there were serious trouble.
In Europe, the bailout of institutions as big as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae would be made all the more difficult because governments would want to limit contributions of taxpayers’ money, especially if the bank were based in another country.
In spite of the stress gripping the sector, EU central bankers are mostly confident that European banks can withstand the impact.
With Lehman Brothers in dire straits on Saturday, Germany’s Weber said that at least for German banks “the consequences will be limited” if the US investment bank avoided a catastrophic end.
Likewise, Bank of France Governor Christian Noyer said on Thursday that “our banks remained robust and well equipped” in the face of the ongoing international financial crisis.
While stating that Italian banks also had limited exposure to the turbulence, Bank of Italy Governor Mario Draghi predicted on Saturday that “there’ll be a series of consolidations in the international banking sector.”
Also See: Lehman rescue talks continue
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering