Whites in South Africa earn five times more than their black counterparts on average, a new study found, illustrating the enduring legacy of apartheid 14 years after its abolition.
A study done for the UASA union made waves in the Rainbow Nation last week when it showed that whites bring home 450 percent more than blacks on average and 400 percent more than their mixed race peers.
In line with the global trend, education is the single biggest determinant of earning power, it concluded, but in a country with South Africa’s history the issue has a powerful racial dimension.
“That blacks weren’t allowed on to certain beaches [during the apartheid era of whites-only rule] can be changed overnight but education has a long-lasting legacy,” said the author of the research, economist Mike Schussler. “My concern is that our current education system hasn’t overcome that legacy so we are going to be stuck with the problems for a while longer.”
Under apartheid, says Marius Roodt, researcher at the South African Institute for Race Relations, whites had access to “near world class” schools and universities.
On the other hand, “African people were seen as unworthy of an education and 14 years isn’t going to be enough to address that,” he said.
This hangover has been tackled from an economic point of view — resources for schools are now equally distributed between historically white and historically black institutions.
“Funding is pretty equal across the spectrum. The difference now lies in the fact that historically black schools are performing dismally,” says Servaas Van der Berg, an economist and wage specialist from South Africa’s University of Stellenbosch.
Underachievement can be ascribed to the lower quality of teachers in the mainly black townships as well as social issues related to attitudes to education.
Research in other countries has shown that parental achievement is critical — a child of parents who went to university is more likely to stay in the education system longer and gain a degree.
Van der Berg underlines that other factors should be taken into account when looking at current wage distribution patterns in South Africa, which reflect the racially divided past but are not necessarily indicative of discrimination today.
Whites are concentrated in urban areas, where wages are higher and skilled employment and the services industry are more prevalent. Blacks dominate agricultural, rural areas.
“During apartheid the ideology was that blacks were unnecessary in urban areas and they were supposed to go back to their homelands,” he said.
Another factor affecting the disparity in earnings is statistical because of differing birth and death rates, the white population is on average older, and therefore richer, than the black population. One of the most comprehensive studies of the labor market was published by specialists Rulof Burger and Rachel Jafta in 2006 called Returns to Race: Labour Market Discrimination in Post-Apartheid South Africa.
It concluded that wages were no longer determined by simple race discrimination — blacks being overlooked or worse paid for jobs because of their skin color — but were mostly influenced by educational attainment.
“There appears to have been a shift away from ‘pure discrimination’ and towards differential returns to education,” the study concluded.
Burger said that on average a white worker completes more years of education than the average black worker — 12.6 years as opposed to 8.8 — who also “still receives an education of inferior quality.”
“This is a remnant of the apartheid legacy which the department of education has so far been unable to rectify,” Burger said, adding the unemployment rate for blacks is five times higher than that of whites.
Policy responses to the economic inequality caused by the apartheid system have centered on increasing funding for black schools, affirmative action and land redistribution.
Burger and Jafta found affirmative action had led to a narrowing of wage differences for the top, most highly paid jobs, but had “had no observable effect on the racial employment gap.”
The key therefore to achieving a more equal distribution of wages among the white, black and mixed race population is harmonizing education standards across the country, commentators say.
But this most vital of objectives is far from being achieved.
“Former white schools are still pretty good, but we still see in African townships that schools are dysfunctional,” Roodt said.
Schussler agreed, saying: “We are spending a lot on education and we’re just not getting the results we need.”
US President Donald Trump yesterday announced sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" on US trading partners, including a 32 percent tax on goods from Taiwan that is set to take effect on Wednesday. At a Rose Garden event, Trump declared a 10 percent baseline tax on imports from all countries, with the White House saying it would take effect on Saturday. Countries with larger trade surpluses with the US would face higher duties beginning on Wednesday, including Taiwan (32 percent), China (34 percent), Japan (24 percent), South Korea (25 percent), Vietnam (46 percent) and Thailand (36 percent). Canada and Mexico, the two largest US trading
ACTION PLAN: Taiwan would expand procurement from the US and encourage more companies to invest in the US to deepen bilateral cooperation, Lai said The government would not impose reciprocal tariffs in retaliation against US levies, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, as he announced five strategies to address the issue, including pledging to increase Taiwanese companies’ investments in the US. Lai has in the past few days met with administrative and national security officials, as well as representatives from various industries, to explore countermeasures after US President Donald Trump on Wednesday last week announced a 32 percent duty on Taiwanese imports. In a video released yesterday evening, Lai said that Taiwan would not retaliate against the US with higher tariffs and Taiwanese companies’ commitments to
‘SPECIAL CHANNEL’: Taipei’s most important tasks are to stabilize industries affected by Trump’s trade tariffs and keep negotiations with Washington open, a source said National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) arrived in the US for talks with US President Donald Trump’s administration, a source familiar with the matter said on Friday. Wu was leading a delegation for a meeting known as the “special channel,” the Financial Times reported earlier. It marked Trump’s first use of the channel since returning to the White House on Jan. 20. Citing a source familiar with the matter, the Financial Times reported that Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) was also a part of the delegation. The visit came days after China concluded war games around Taiwan and amid Trump’s
CHIP EXCEPTION: An official said that an exception for Taiwanese semiconductors would have a limited effect, as most are packaged in third nations before being sold The Executive Yuan yesterday decried US President Donald Trump’s 32 percent tariff on Taiwanese goods announced hours earlier as “unfair,” saying it would lodge a representation with Washington. The Cabinet in a statement described the pledged US tariffs, expected to take effect on Wednesday next week, as “deeply unreasonable” and “highly regrettable.” Cabinet spokeswoman Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said that the government would “lodge a solemn representation” with the US Trade Representative and continue negotiating with Washington to “ensure the interests of our nation and industries.” Trump at a news conference in Washington on Wednesday announced a 10 percent baseline tariff on most goods