Bloggers beware. Big Brother is watching.
The recent arrest of three Singaporeans accused of making racial slurs on Internet message boards has sparked concerns of a cyberspace crackdown by authorities in Singapore and neighboring Malaysia, where strict laws suppress outspokenness.
Web logs, or blogs, a global online phenomenon, are seen as the high-tech equivalent of personal diaries, but they've also become a public forum for free speech in Singapore and Malaysia, where the media are tightly controlled and provocative views are rarely heard.
Now, bloggers in both countries fear they'll have to watch their words, following the arrest of Benjamin Koh Song Huat (許松發), 27, and Nicholas Lim Yew (林友和), 25, in Singapore on Monday last week for allegedly posting comments insulting the country's Muslim Malay minority. A third Singaporean, a 17-year-old, was charged separately last Friday, the Straits Times reported, but it did not identify him.
Charged with sedition, all three face prison terms of up to three years if convicted.
While some bloggers say they deserve little sympathy because their remarks were repugnant, the case has triggered concern that Singapore's government might be tightening social controls.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) said his government will act against anyone who threatens racial and religious harmony, whether on the Internet or in any other forum, a newspaper reported yesterday.
"Whether you do it on the Internet, whether you do it in the newspapers, whether you go and say it in public or even at the Speakers' Corner, it doesn't matter where you say it. This is a message which is not acceptable," the Straits Times quoted Lee as saying.
Speakers' Corner is a state-approved site where people can express their views, but opposition figures dismiss it as an attempt to show that the government tolerates outspokenness.
Lee said racist remarks cannot be tolerated as they send wrong signals to people who might want to say "something foolish" and also because they send a "very wrong signal to all minorities in Singapore," the newspaper said.
"It is against the law, and the Sedition Act specifically puts it down that it is creating disaffection and distrust and enmity between the races, and we will act according to the law," Lee said.
Koh and Lim are the first bloggers to be arrested and charged in Singapore.
In May, Chen Jiahao (陳家豪), a Singaporean studying in the US, was threatened with a lawsuit for allegedly defamatory criticism about Singapore's scholarship policies. Chen was spared after he apologized and closed down his personal Web site.
International press freedom group Reporters Without Borders decried the lawsuit as "intimidation" that "could make the country's blogs as timid and obedient as the traditional media."
The racial element was bound to raise hackles in Singapore, where ethnic Chinese comprise 80 percent of the city-state's 4.2 million populace, with Malays making up around 15 percent and ethnic Indians some 5 percent.
Neighboring Malaysia has a similarly delicate ethnic mix among its 25 million people, with nearly 60 percent Malays, 25 percent Chinese, 10 percent Indians and a number of other groups.
Both nations pride themselves on racial harmony and rank among Southeast Asia's most peaceful places, but critics say the apparent racial order is forced by their governments, using tough laws such as the one that hit the bloggers.
In Malaysia, laws provide for one-year prison sentences for Web users who post false, indecent or offensive material.
"The online environment is not a legal vacuum," warns the Communications and Multimedia Content Code. "In general, if something is illegal off-line, it will also be illegal online."
Malaysian bloggers have faced no legal repercussions so far, but many have been worried since the government threatened one popular Web writer with jail after a racially provocative comment was posted on his Web site.
Jeff Ooi (黃泉安) was warned he could be jailed under a law that allows imprisonment without trial if one `encourages' debate on contentious issues after a reader published a comment that offended Muslims.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS