World Trade Organization (WTO) chief Supachai Panitchpakdi warned yesterday that failure to make substantial progress in trade liberalization talks would be a "recipe for disaster" for the global trading system.
"We have not been making the kind of progress that we have expected; we have worked very hard ... but up to now we have not seen much substantial results," he told a two-day WTO mini-ministerial that opened in Dalian, China yesterday.
He was lamenting years of drawn-out negotiations in the WTO Doha Round of talks that began in 2001 but have missed nearly all its targets for liberalizing world trade.
PHOTO: AFP
"If we keep on like this ... the talks will be full of divergences and opposition as opposed to convergences ... this will be a recipe for disaster and failure," Supachai said.
Some 32 trade ministers are taking part in the Dalian meeting, out of the WTO's full membership of 148. Yesterday's opening discussions were to focus on agriculture, officials said.
The Doha Round aims to expand free trade in a way that benefits poor nations but the developing world is accusing developed nations of refusing to give up a trade system largely skewered in favor of the rich countries.
Members faced their biggest crisis in 2003 as the Cancun summit in Mexico collapsed in a confrontation between rich and poor over trade in services and agricultural export subsidies.
However, last week at the G8 meeting of industrialized nations in Scotland, the US and the EU pledged to get rid of the trade-distorting agricultural export subsidies as a means to boost the ongoing WTO talks.
The EU and the US are broadly hoping that developing countries will offer concessions on trade in services and industrial goods in exchange for an end to their agricultural subsidies.
Member states are hoping that a set of trade "formulas and modalities" that define trade liberalization and market access can be hammered out in the coming weeks and presented at a WTO ministerial meeting in Hong Kong in December.
"We need strong support and positive signals which can be translated into progress at the negotiating table in [late July talks] in Geneva," Supachai said.
Chinese Trade Minister Bo Xilai (薄熙來), host of the meeting, meanwhile urged states to accept 2010 as the deadline for the end of export subsidies and to quickly reach a consensus on thresholds for market access and agricultural supports.
"I have put forward ... suggestions to the EU, India, Brazil and the United States," Bo said.
"The first is whether we can strive to finish a consensus concerning a time frame for the elimination of export subsidies, namely identifying 2010 as a deadline," he said.
"The second, in the area of market access and domestic support for agriculture, is on whether we can reach a consensus for tier divisions and thresholds for each tier," he said, referring to the detailed technical language defining the two areas of trade.
However, he also played down expectations from the Dalian meeting.
"If we can make even small progress then I think it would be a contribution [from China]," Bo told Supachai in a bilateral meeting.
Observers of the ongoing negotiations voiced widespread pessimism of a successful outcome.
"World trade talks are at a crisis point," said Celine Charveriat of Oxfam International, a group advocating fair trade for poor nations.
"With less than six months to go before the WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong, negotiators are miles from consensus and have failed even to produce draft texts for discussion," she said.
Charveriat said the G8 missed the opportunity to give the talks the boost they needed.
"Their rhetoric is sadly mis-matched with the state of WTO negotiations in Geneva where rich country intransigence and self-interest is blocking progress and jeopardizing the whole round," Charveriat said.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say