In a landmark decision, the WTO ruled against American cotton subsidies in a case brought by Brazil, officials from the two countries said on Friday.
The decision could eventually lead the US to reduce subsidies for its entire farm sector and encourage other countries to challenge such aid in wealthy nations, analysts said.
The WTO report, which was not made public, upheld a preliminary ruling in April that supported Brazil's claim that the more than US$3 billion in subsidies the US pays its cotton farmers distorts global prices and violates international trade rules.
"We are very satisfied with the panel's decision," Roberto Aze-vedo, who heads the trade disputes department at Brazil's foreign ministry, said in a phone interview from Brasilia.
"Once this is all over with, we expect the United States to comply with the ruling," he said.
In Washington, Bush administration officials criticized the decision, arguing that the best way to address distortions in world agriculture trade was through negotiations, not litigation. The officials also said the US would appeal, a process that could drag on for months, and possibly more than a year.
"We believe US farm programs were designed to be, and are, fully consistent with our WTO obligations," Richard Mills, a spokesman for the US trade representative, Robert Zoellick, said in a telephone interview.
"We will defend U.S. agricultural interests in every form we need to, and we have no intention of unilaterally disarming," he added, referring to the US$19 billion in annual subsidies paid out to American farmers.
The WTO ruling is not expected to be made public until late August. An arbitration panel will then decide what damages are due and to what extent Brazil can retaliate if the US does not comply with the ruling.
In its complaint, Brazil, the world's fifth-largest cotton producer, used data from the US Department of Agriculture to argue that the subsidies led to increased American cotton output, robbing Brazil of potential export markets and undermining the livelihoods of its farmers.
If Washington scrapped the subsidies, Brazil estimated, American cotton exports would fall 41 percent and production would drop 29 percent. That, in turn, would lead to a 12.6 percent increase in world cotton prices, helping struggling cotton farmers from Brazil to West Africa.
Brazil also claimed that the US was providing illegal export subsidies to American agribusiness companies, who were given US$1.7 billion to buy American cotton from 1999 to 2001, the period covered in the WTO challenge. The combined aid has helped make the US the world's top cotton exporter, with more than 40 percent of the world market.
As the first successful challenge of a wealthy nation's agricultural subsidies, the cotton case could help energize global trade talks, which have been stalled for more than a year over agriculture.
The decision also sets a precedent that could encourage more WTO complaints from other developing countries that feel unfairly punished by the US$300 billion in annual farm subsidies and supports paid to farmers in the world's richest nations.
"This has a value as a precedent that goes very far and broad," said Gary Hufbauer, a trade specialist at the Institute for International Economics in Washington.
"It opens the doors for countries who are affected by agricultural subsidies to challenge a lot of other subsidies: sugar, corn, almost any product.," he said.
Taiwan joined the case, along with Argentina, Australia, Benin, Canada, China, the European Community, India and several other countries as third parties.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
INVESTMENT WATCH: The US activity would not affect the firm’s investment in Taiwan, where 11 production lines would likely be completed this year, C.C. Wei said Investments by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in the US should not be a cause for concern, but rather seen as the moment that the company and Taiwan stepped into the global spotlight, President William Lai (賴清德) told a news conference at the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday alongside TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家). Wei and US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday announced plans to invest US$100 billion in the US to build three advanced foundries, two packaging plants, and a research and development center, after Trump threatened to slap tariffs on chips made
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of