US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told US troops yesterday that he backed a NATO force playing a role in Afghanistan after next year, as Washington and Afghan President Hamid Karzai wrangle over a stalled security pact.
Hagel traveled to the southern province of Helmand to meet troops a day after further tensions over the security pact that would allow NATO forces to stay in the country after next year.
“I believe there is a role for our coalition partners and the United States, but that depends on the Afghan people,” Hagel told US soldiers in a question-and-answer session.
“If the people of Afghanistan want to continue that relationship, then we will,” he added.
US commanders were looking at “a new phase for our mission to train, assist, advise and counterterrorism,” he said.
Meetings with Karzai have been customary over the years for Pentagon chiefs, but Hagel said on Saturday after his arrival that he had no plans to meet the Afghan president during his weekend visit.
As US President Barack Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice and US Secretary of State John Kerry had already had frank discussions with Karzai urging him to sign the security agreement, Hagel said there was no point in him repeating the US position.
“There’s not much I can add in a meeting with President Karzai to what’s already been said,” he said on Saturday.
Hagel did meet the Afghan defense minister, who assured him the security agreement would be signed in “a timely manner.”
Karzai initially endorsed the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA), but has since refused to sign and issued fresh demands.
The agreement sets the legal conditions to permit US and other forces to operate in the country beyond next year.
However, without a signed deal, countries ready to send troops to a post-next year training mission cannot make budget plans or secure political approval, Hagel said.
Karzai has said the signature could take place after elections in April, but Hagel said that would push the timeline into the middle of next year as the polls are expected to result in a run-off vote.
Eventually there will be “a cut-off point” to cancel a post-next year mission, he said on Saturday, adding that he was “not prepared to give a date on that.”
He said a meeting of NATO defense ministers in February would be crucial for military planners and governments “and some answers are going to be required at that NATO ministerial.”
There are currently 46,000 US troops and 27,000 soldiers from other coalition countries in Afghanistan, however almost the entire NATO-led force is scheduled to pull out by the end of next year.
With the long war in Afghanistan often overlooked in the US and Europe, he told the group of US Marines and Army troops yesterday that they were not forgotten.
“I know more than occasionally you wonder if anybody is paying attention, whether anybody cares,” Hagel said.
“But we do. Our country cares, we do know what you’re doing. And we appreciate it, very much,” he said.
Under a proposed post-next year mission, about 12,000 troops — mostly US ones — would remain in the country to train Afghans and counter militant activities.
In 2011, the US withdrew from Iraq when it failed to secure a similar troop status accord.
OPTIMISTIC: A Philippine Air Force spokeswoman said the military believed the crew were safe and were hopeful that they and the jet would be recovered A Philippine Air Force FA-50 jet and its two-person crew are missing after flying in support of ground forces fighting communist rebels in the southern Mindanao region, a military official said yesterday. Philippine Air Force spokeswoman Colonel Consuelo Castillo said the jet was flying “over land” on the way to its target area when it went missing during a “tactical night operation in support of our ground troops.” While she declined to provide mission specifics, Philippine Army spokesman Colonel Louie Dema-ala confirmed that the missing FA-50 was part of a squadron sent “to provide air support” to troops fighting communist rebels in
ECONOMIC DISTORTION? The US commerce secretary’s remarks echoed Elon Musk’s arguments that spending by the government does not create value for the economy US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that government spending could be separated from GDP reports, in response to questions about whether the spending cuts pushed by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency could possibly cause an economic downturn. “You know that governments historically have messed with GDP,” Lutnick said on Fox News Channel’s Sunday Morning Futures. “They count government spending as part of GDP. So I’m going to separate those two and make it transparent.” Doing so could potentially complicate or distort a fundamental measure of the US economy’s health. Government spending is traditionally included in the GDP because
Two daughters of an Argentine mountaineer who died on an icy peak 40 years ago have retrieved his backpack from the spot — finding camera film inside that allowed them a glimpse of some of his final experiences. Guillermo Vieiro was 44 when he died in 1985 — as did his climbing partner — while descending Argentina’s Tupungato lava dome, one of the highest peaks in the Americas. Last year, his backpack was spotted on a slope by mountaineer Gabriela Cavallaro, who examined it and contacted Vieiro’s daughters Guadalupe, 40, and Azul, 44. Last month, the three set out with four other guides
Sri Lanka’s fragile economic recovery could be hampered by threatened trade union strikes over reduced benefits for government employees in this year’s budget, the IMF said yesterday. Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s maiden budget raised public sector salaries, but also made deep cuts to longstanding perks in a continuing effort to repair the island nation’s tattered finances. Sri Lanka’s main doctors’ union is considering a strike from today to protest against cuts to their allowances, while teachers are also considering stoppages. IMF senior mission chief for Sri Lanka Peter Breuer said the budget was the “last big push” for the country’s austerity
RSS