Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), a prominent human rights lawyer whose 13-month disappearance at the hands of Chinese security agents stirred an international outcry until he resurfaced in March, has again vanished, his friends said on Friday.
Associates said Gao failed to return to a Beijing apartment on April 20 after spending more than a week in Urumqi, the capital of the Xinjiang region, where he had been visiting his father-in-law.
Gao telephoned his father-in-law as his plane left Urumqi, saying he would call upon his arrival in Beijing, they said.
That appeared to be his last contact with the outside world. Li Heping (李和平), another Beijing human rights lawyer and a close friend, said he had visited Gao’s apartment repeatedly, but had not found him.
“No one had been there for a while,” said Li, who last went to the apartment on Thursday. “I have no idea who to call, or who has taken him.”
Others said they were sure that the government had again removed him from public view and that the authorities’ earlier decision to allow him to resurface briefly had been a ploy to try to demonstrate to the outside world that he had not been mistreated.
“Now we understand that the freedom was arranged by the authorities just for a show,” Jiang Tianyong (江天勇), a Beijing lawyer and rights activist, said by telephone. “He is missing again; he is still under their control. We must continue to pay attention to his case.”
An official of Amnesty International said on Friday that the organization was “seriously concerned” for Gao’s safety.
“It’s a matter of serious concern when he loses contact with his family and friends,” Catherine Baber, the organization’s deputy director for Asia and Pacific programs, said in a telephone interview from London.
Gao, whose outspoken approach has made him a contentious figure, is one of the country’s best-known activists. He has also been a ceaseless gadfly to Chinese authorities.
In the early 2000s he earned international attention, and the government’s enmity, for his legal work on behalf of marginalized citizens, including members of underground Christian churches and practitioners of Falun Gong, the spiritual movement that Chinese authorities say is an antigovernment cabal.
After Gao sent letters to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), accusing the government of persecuting Falun Gong members, he was stripped of his law license and sentenced to prison in late 2006 on charges of inciting subversion.
After being released, Gao said he had been tortured, adding that he had also been warned that discussing his torture publicly would result in his death.
Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (楊潔箎) denied those claims at a news conference in March.
“There is no such thing as him being tortured,” he said.
Gao and his family were under constant surveillance and harassment after his release. Early last year his wife and two children escaped from eventually gaining asylum in the US.
Gao disappeared shortly afterward. Despite pleas from the US, the EU and the UN, he was not seen again until he appeared in March at a Buddhist monastery in northern China.
In a telephone interview then with the New York Times, he said he had given up his work as a human rights defender and merely sought “to calm down and lead a quiet life.”
He refused to say whether he had suffered mistreatment while in captivity. In an April 7 interview with The Associated Press, he said simply: “I don’t have the capacity to persevere.”
DEBT BREAK: Friedrich Merz has vowed to do ‘whatever it takes’ to free up more money for defense and infrastructure at a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty Germany’s likely next leader Friedrich Merz was set yesterday to defend his unprecedented plans to massively ramp up defense and infrastructure spending in the Bundestag as lawmakers begin debating the proposals. Merz unveiled the plans last week, vowing his center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) bloc and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) — in talks to form a coalition after last month’s elections — would quickly push them through before the end of the current legislature. Fraying Europe-US ties under US President Donald Trump have fueled calls for Germany, long dependent on the US security umbrella, to quickly
RARE EVENT: While some cultures have a negative view of eclipses, others see them as a chance to show how people can work together, a scientist said Stargazers across a swathe of the world marveled at a dramatic red “Blood Moon” during a rare total lunar eclipse in the early hours of yesterday morning. The celestial spectacle was visible in the Americas and Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as in the westernmost parts of Europe and Africa. The phenomenon happens when the sun, Earth and moon line up, causing our planet to cast a giant shadow across its satellite. But as the Earth’s shadow crept across the moon, it did not entirely blot out its white glow — instead the moon glowed a reddish color. This is because the
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the