Nine years after US-led forces invaded Afghanistan, NATO now says it has a coherent plan to begin handing over security and governing duties to Afghan provincial authorities by November.
During talks in Tallinn, Estonia, alliance foreign ministers on Friday endorsed guidelines for passing control to the Afghans as foreign forces step up efforts to drive a resurgent Taliban and al-Qaeda from the country.
“We agreed [on] the approach we will take to transition,” NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after two days of talks.
“As of today, we have a roadmap that will lead towards transition to Afghan control starting this year, at which point our publics will start to see the progress for which they have quite rightly been asking,” Rasmussen said.
He said he hoped that the Afghan government and the international community would endorse the plan at a conference to be held in Kabul in mid-July, with the transfer of duties starting in November, when NATO holds its next summit in Lisbon.
The Afghans have already taken the lead in security in the capital Kabul, he said.
Mark Sedwill, NATO’s senior civilian representative in Afghanistan, said he expected Afghan local leaders to start assuming control in the more stable provinces stretching north and west from the Khyber Pass to Nimroz.
NATO planners, he told reporters, are trying to determine the conditions needed to ensure the authorities are competent enough to take the lead in security as well as provide fair and good government service and economic development.
“Gradually, as the transition goes through, you would expect them to build up and us to draw down,” Sidwell said.
Allied troops would pull back from frontline combat and play only a supporting role in preparation for an eventual pullout, he said.
The conditions, which are still being worked on, will also seek to ensure that the Afghan authorities reflect the area’s right ethnic and tribal mix, Sedwill said.
“If there were people excluded, even if it’s quiet now, you are just storing up problems for the future,” he said.
The transition plan flows from the revamped strategy for Afghanistan that US President Barack Obama announced in December when he ordered the deployment of 30,000 new troops to the country.
Under the plan, he set July next year as the date for their drawdown to begin.
However, Obama has repeated that the speed of the US drawdown and departure from Afghanistan of US and allied troops will be dictated by how successful they are in stabilizing the country and how quickly the Afghans can take over.
The US and some 10,000 allied reinforcements are joining 90,000 troops drawn from more than 40 nations.
NATO is also pressing for 450 more trainers to build up the Afghan army and police — a key part of the plan to turn security over to the Afghans — and have allied forces assume a supporting role before eventually withdrawing.
Asked why it was so hard for other NATO members to come up with the numbers when Washington was deploying so many new troops, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters she was in fact “heartened” by allies’ response.
“We have a relatively small gap that we’re still working to fill,” the chief US diplomat said.
Not only did she expect the alliance to meet the numbers required but she also hailed the broader spirit of cooperation.
“I’m very encouraged by the close cooperation among countries and their forces, their military troops, their civilian experts, and I see everyday results of this much better coordinated approach,” she added.
NATO sees a troop pullout as hinging on Afghans being able to provide their own security, promote economic development, and govern properly without tribal and ethnic rivalries sowing the seeds of renewed conflict.
But, as casualties rise with the new troop surge, international forces are under growing pressure in Afghanistan and at home to leave.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS