On a grey Friday afternoon in Paris, Amina and her girlfriends are carrying fake designer handbags and wearing trainers sodden by the rain. Their heads are enveloped in the fur lining of their jacket hoods, their eyes rimmed with black kohl, and they are chatting vivaciously, swapping numbers on their shiny cell phones.
But there is one factor which distinguishes this group of young women from a standard cluster of twentysomethings. Amina, 21, is dressed in a black veil which covers her entire body and most of her face. And, as she speaks, her eyes flash with pride and indignation.
“I choose to wear this. Not every day, just now and again. But when I do wear it, it is entirely of my own volition. No one is forcing me,” she says, standing with her friends on a busy street corner in the heavily Muslim northern district of Barbes. “If they make us take it off they’ll be taking a part of us. I’d rather die than let them do it.”
Amina, who is studying at the university of Paris, is in the eye of a storm which in recent months has swept through France and left resentment in its wake.
Citing concerns about laicite — secularism — and equality of the sexes, members of parliament voted last week to push through legislation that would forbid women from wearing the full Islamic veil in official spaces such as hospitals, post offices and buses. Figures from all political parties, feminist groups and even an imam have condemned a piece of clothing they describe as a “walking prison.”
The proposals — which have been denounced as “stigmatizing” by some and as too lenient by others — were the result of a parliamentary inquiry that has raised fresh questions about what it means to be a Muslim in France. If its path through parliament is smooth, the partial ban could come into effect by the end of the year.
For Amina and her friends, who as young Frenchwomen are typical of the estimated 1,900 people in the country that a government report says are believed to wear the niqab, the idea of a ban is a “shocking” attempt by the state to interfere with an act they insist is their own religious choice — ironically, they say, out of a concern for laicite.
“France is supposed to be a free country. Nowadays women have the right to take their clothes off but not put them on,” Kheira says.
She is showing her face, but says she has her niqab wrapped up in her handbag.
Since the idea of a ban was first mooted last summer, the women say they have noticed a rise in hostility from the public which has seen them “verbally insulted” and stared at in the street. French traditions of the separation of church and state, which in 2004 saw headscarves and “conspicuous” religious symbols banned from schools, mean that as overt a religious statement as the niqab makes many people uneasy.
Last week French President Nicolas Sarkozy, keen to dispel the belief that his policies are doing more harm than good to intra-community relations, insisted he would let no French Muslim citizen be “stigmatized.” But that is exactly what many feel he has already done.
“They are demonizing Islam,” Kheira says .
“It started with the headscarf. Then it was the [discussion about] minarets. Now it’s the niqab.” Samia says.
The issue is not so straightforward, however, for the rest of France’s Muslim population, which at between 5 and 6 million is the largest in western Europe. For many in Barbes — home to a poor but vibrant Maghrebi community — the niqab is a rare sight and one which alienates some Muslims as much as it does some others.
“Personally I think there should be a ban,” says one man, a local bartender of Moroccan origin. “It annoys me to see a woman all covered up.”
Such views are not uncommon among a Muslim mainstream which feels there is a gulf between their religious practices and those of a tiny minority of women generally thought to be influenced by the strict brand of Salafi Islam. And, while many others are indifferent to the niqab, they object to being held hostage by that minority; some fear the niqab has given the authorities an excuse to target the entire Muslim population.
“It angers me because it’s my community they’re talking about. It’s giving the wrong idea of what it is to be Muslim,” explains Kemal Idris, 50, an Algerian working in a halal butchers’ near the local, oversubscribed mosque.
But while he sympathizes with concern for female freedom and laicite, he believes there are many more “serious problems” which need tackling first.
“How many burqas are there in France? 100? 200? No one knows. I’ve lived in this area for 25 years and I don’t think I’ve ever seen one. That is not the problem,” he says.
Ever since the autumn, when French Immigration Minister, Eric Besson, launched a nationwide debate into “national identity” in a purported attempt to bring unity to a fractured country, critics have accused the government of pursuing a provocative line which risks exacerbating, rather than healing, social tensions. Very often, Muslim “integration” is the topic up for discussion.
But many people believe that, if France is to make good on its promises to be the upholder of freedom and human rights, it would do better to fix the big issues facing Muslims — discrimination, urban planning and unemployment — than to engage in a theoretical debate about their place in the nation.
As for the niqab, the implementation of a ban could act as a provocation.
“The more we’re stopped the more we’ll do it. Out of solidarity,” Samia says. “It’s a battle.”
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
Cook Islands officials yesterday said they had discussed seabed minerals research with China as the small Pacific island mulls deep-sea mining of its waters. The self-governing country of 17,000 people — a former colony of close partner New Zealand — has licensed three companies to explore the seabed for nodules rich in metals such as nickel and cobalt, which are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Despite issuing the five-year exploration licenses in 2022, the Cook Islands government said it would not decide whether to harvest the potato-sized nodules until it has assessed environmental and other impacts. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown