Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, an early supporter of a controversial project to build St Petersburg’s first glass skyscraper, is now expected to scrap it because of mounting opposition at home and abroad.
The 403m tower, intended to house offices of state-run gas giant Gazprom, has caused an outcry among St Petersburg residents, Russian opposition parties and the UN cultural agency UNESCO.
Putin has said he supports the US$3 billion project in his hometown as it would help the economy of the former imperial capital and revive a neglected corner of the city — but that a decision lies with the city authorities.
Opponents say the tower would ruin the unique skyline of the city. State media and some officials have begun to express doubts after years of support.
UNESCO has warned Russia it could exclude St Petersburg from its list of world heritage sites if the tower is built, as it would dominate the canals and baroque houses of the city founded by Tsar Peter the Great in 1703.
“It is very likely that it will be Putin who will draw a line under the project,” said Maxim Reznik, leader of opposition party Yabloko in St Petersburg, who is suing the city administration in court in an effort to get the project dropped.
Putin’s approval ratings fell this month for the first time since the start of the economic crisis and aides reacted with a campaign to improve his image.
“Putin has always been against imposing his opinion on citizens and those in the city who take architectural decisions,” Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
He declined to say whether Putin could scrap a project already approved by the office of St Petersburg’s mayor.
Three years ago Putin ordered a key oil pipeline to be rerouted after protests by ecologists who said it could endanger Lake Baikal and its rare species.
Putin stepped down as president last year but remains Russia’s most powerful politician, and most Russians believe he will run for president again in 2012.”
Some officials have expressed concern about the project.
“Russia’s Regions Ministry believes that it is not reasonable to place a 400m building in direct proximity to world heritage cultural sites,” the ministry said last week.
Russian Culture Minister Alexander Avdeyev said last month he was skeptical about the tower.
Gazprom spokesman Sergei Kupriyanov said chief executive Alexei Miller, a close Putin ally, was aware the debate was heating up.
“We are continuing all work and there has been no order to back off,” he said.
Maxim Shevchenko, a popular presenter on the main state TV channel ORT, conducted a fierce anti-Gazprom debate on ORT last week, contrasting sharply with the usual image of Gazprom as Russia’s most important firm.
“By showing such stubbornness, Miller has managed to turn a simple construction and architectural issue into almost a political issue,” Shevchenko said. “If Miller takes the issue so personally, I guess there is only one authority for him — Putin.”
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS