Arab states — and Israel — are watching intently as Iran’s political convulsions continue, seeking clues to how the unfolding crisis will affect the strategic picture in the Middle East, especially the key issue of the Islamic republic’s nuclear ambitions.
In a region where democratic politics are the exception, there is nervousness about the implications of people power on the streets of Tehran. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is deeply unpopular — but mass protests worry all autocrats.
ISRAEL
Officially and in public, at least, Israeli officials have spoken of their deep concern about Ahmadinejad’s apparent re-election. Israel’s rightwing government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has made a priority of challenging Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On Sunday night, Netanyahu said the world’s greatest challenge today was “the nexus between radical Islam and nuclear weapons.”
However, in private, Israeli officials appeared to be hoping for an Ahmadinejad victory even before the polls opened, despite his vitriolic criticism of Israel, his denial of the Holocaust and his apparent eagerness for a nuclear weapons program.
Israeli newspapers quoted several senior officials anonymously saying a win for Ahmadinejad would help Israel because, as they saw it, none of the candidates differed very much on policy and Ahmadinejad’s strong language and blunt actions made him easier to criticize internationally.
“Considering the circumstances, he is the best thing that ever happened to us,” one foreign ministry official was quoted as saying in the popular Ma’ariv newspaper last Friday.
Ben Caspit, a Ma’ariv columnist, put it even more bluntly that morning: “If you have friends in Iran, try to convince them to vote for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today ... There is no one who will serve Israel’s PR interests better.”
Far fewer were the voices who questioned that line of thinking. Among them was Aluf Benn, a Ha’aretz columnist who dismissed the support for Ahmadinejad as a “blatant manifestation of the narrow horizons of Israeli strategic thinking.”
LEBANON
Recently emerging from their own political upheavals, savvy Lebanese see much of themselves in the people politics unfolding in Tehran.
“It reminds me of our protests,” said Haitham Chamas, an activist who helped organize protests in 2005 that brought 1 million Lebanese to the streets calling for democratic reforms and the fall of the government.
Just as in Tehran, that opposition was swiftly answered by a huge rally in support of the incumbent regime, organized then by Hezbollah, which is allied with Iran and Syria.
Chamas and friends have spent the last week talking of little else but what the historic events unfolding in Iran could mean for Lebanon, where Iranian financing of Hezbollah has divided opinion like never before.
The Western-backed government, known as March 14, recently beat Hezbollah and its allies in undisputed elections.
“I think if [defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein] Mousavi’s supporters stay on the streets for a week the regime will fall and that will seriously affect Hezbollah,” Chamas said.
Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, was quick to congratulate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his disputed re-election, saying it represented “great hope to all the oppressed people.”
In the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of Beirut, men and women speak admiringly of Ahmadinejad as a true leader of the Shiite cause and brand Mousavi “Iran’s March 14 candidate.”
But for those who see Iran as meddling in Lebanon’s affairs, the turmoil in Tehran brings a certain satisfaction.
“Now the Iranians are arranging their own house, so perhaps we can expect a little less interference in ours,” said Sawssan Abou Zahr, a journalist with An Nahar newspaper.
IRAQ
Iran’s near neighbor and former arch-foe has remained largely silent in the wake of the post-election revolt.
The Iraqi street is paying little heed to the contested result and national leaders have passed only cursory congratulations to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the tumultuous days since.
Lawmakers from the Shiite parties have mostly refused public comment to Iraqi media. Many maintain close links to establishment figures in Tehran and some owe their careers to the patronage of Shiite Islamic clerics and supporters.
However, with elections just over six months away, Iraqi MPs are keen to distance themselves from the perception of foreign sponsorship and to concentrate on shaping a sovereign state.
On the streets, people were ambivalent.
“This is the Middle East,” said a woman from Baghdad. “Wars and revolutions happen all the time.”
GULF STATES
In Saudi Arabia, Iran’s main Arab adversary and leader of the conservative US-backed camp, the government has made no public comment. But there are signs of concern about the effect of the unrest on the Shiite majority in the kingdom’s oil-producing eastern provinces.
“The Saudis are watching this upheaval and internal divisions with satisfaction,” said political analyst Mai Yamani. “It weakens the aggressive ambitions of Iran as they see it. It also damages the prospects for talks between the [US President Barack] Obama administration and Iran, which they feel would be at Saudi expense if they succeeded.”
The United Arab Emirates, which has a long-running dispute with Iran over three tiny Gulf islands, congratulated Ahmadinejad. Dubai, home to a large Iranian expatriate community, banned election-related protests.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
Cook Islands officials yesterday said they had discussed seabed minerals research with China as the small Pacific island mulls deep-sea mining of its waters. The self-governing country of 17,000 people — a former colony of close partner New Zealand — has licensed three companies to explore the seabed for nodules rich in metals such as nickel and cobalt, which are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Despite issuing the five-year exploration licenses in 2022, the Cook Islands government said it would not decide whether to harvest the potato-sized nodules until it has assessed environmental and other impacts. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and