A court ruled on Friday that security forces who quelled a demonstration by Muslims in southern Thailand in 2004 should not be held responsible for the deaths of 85 protesters, including 78 who died in detention.
The Songkhla provincial court found that army and police carried out their duties lawfully, taking actions that were ruled necessary for security reasons, said Angkhana Neelaphaijit of the Working Group on Justice for Peace, a human rights group which monitored the trial.
Court officials could not immediately be contacted.
An Islamic separatist insurgency in Thailand’s three southernmost provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat has led to the deaths of more than 3,300 people since early 2004.
The incident, which was initially covered up, inflamed the conflict.
A massive counterinsurgency effort has recently slowed the pace of attacks but has shown little sign of ending the violence.
The 85 victims were among more than 1,000 people who demonstrated outside a police station in Narathiwat province’s Tak Bai district for the release of six Muslims held on suspicion of aiding Islamic insurgents.
The Brussels-based International Crisis Group, a nonpartisan think tank, said in a report that the demonstrators included insurgent supporters who tried to provoke a violent confrontation.
When the protest turned violent, security forces opened fire, killing seven people. The 78 others suffocated or were crushed when they were piled on top of each other, like logs, in overcrowded military trucks taking them to a military camp for detention.
The court’s inquest, carried out by two judges, “did not give much weight to witnesses and evidence from the victims’ families,” Angkhana said.
“The court stressed the need to transport the victims to the army base in a rush because the incident happened near a royal palace. The court also said a lot of nails that had been sprayed on the road also delayed the trucks. But the court did not mention how the victims were piled up on top of each other,” she said.
In 2006, in an effort at reconciliation, the military agreed to drop charges against 58 protesters for illegal gathering, illegal possession of arms and causing a public disturbance. The government also paid financial compensation to the families of the dead and injured.
Officials in the south are protected by an emergency decree that exempts them from legal penalties for their actions if they are carried out lawfully in pursuit of their duties.
The identities and precise goals of the insurgents have never been publicly declared, and responsibility is rarely claimed for attacks.
The death of a former head of China’s one-child policy has been met not by tributes, but by castigation of the abandoned policy on social media this week. State media praised Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), former head of China’s National Family Planning Commission from 1988 to 1998, as “an outstanding leader” in her work related to women and children. The reaction on Chinese social media to Peng’s death in Beijing on Sunday, just shy of her 96th birthday, was less positive. “Those children who were lost, naked, are waiting for you over there” in the afterlife, one person posted on China’s Sina Weibo platform. China’s
‘NO COUNTRY BUMPKIN’: The judge rejected arguments that former prime minister Najib Razak was an unwitting victim, saying Najib took steps to protect his position Imprisoned former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak was yesterday convicted, following a corruption trial tied to multibillion-dollar looting of the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state investment fund. The nation’s high court found Najib, 72, guilty on four counts of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering related to more than US$700 million channeled into his personal bank accounts from the 1MDB fund. Najib denied any wrongdoing, and maintained the funds were a political donation from Saudi Arabia and that he had been misled by rogue financiers led by businessman Low Taek Jho. Low, thought to be the scandal’s mastermind, remains
‘POLITICAL LOYALTY’: The move breaks with decades of precedent among US administrations, which have tended to leave career ambassadors in their posts US President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered dozens of US ambassadors to step down, people familiar with the matter said, a precedent-breaking recall that would leave embassies abroad without US Senate-confirmed leadership. The envoys, career diplomats who were almost all named to their jobs under former US president Joe Biden, were told over the phone in the past few days they needed to depart in the next few weeks, the people said. They would not be fired, but finding new roles would be a challenge given that many are far along in their careers and opportunities for senior diplomats can
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese yesterday announced plans for a national bravery award to recognize civilians and first responders who confronted “the worst of evil” during an anti-Semitic terror attack that left 15 dead and has cast a heavy shadow over the nation’s holiday season. Albanese said he plans to establish a special honors system for those who placed themselves in harm’s way to help during the attack on a beachside Hanukkah celebration, like Ahmed al-Ahmed, a Syrian-Australian Muslim who disarmed one of the assailants before being wounded himself. Sajid Akram, who was killed by police during the Dec. 14 attack, and
RSS