Meredith Bowen was getting tired of requests from Facebook friends to exchange make-believe pansies, daffodils and tiny cartoon characters for her “(Lil) Green Patch,” a virtual garden that sprouted on her social-networking page about a year ago.
She was ready to delete it, until she learned The Nature Conservancy was getting a portion of the ad revenue generated by the game.
“I’ve saved like 133 square feet of rainforest,” the 31-year-old Holt resident said.
Bowen illustrates both the potential upside and downside for charitable causes hoping to cash in on the popularity of social-networking sites such as Facebook and News Corp’s MySpace.
With millions of users worldwide, the sites would seem fertile ground for fundraising experiments — especially ones where users aren’t asked to make direct contributions.
But it’s far from certain that social networking will prove as effective as more traditional fundraising methods such as direct mail, telephone solicitation and even e-mails to past donors.
One hurdle to overcome is the sheer deluge of information online.
As Facebook users are bombarded with invitations to send and receive virtual beers, throw snowballs, sign petitions and take quizzes, applications benefiting charities can seem like just another silly game.
“I get so many of those requests,” said Nicole Marble, 23, who works at Michigan State University. “Sometimes I pay attention to them, but with a lot of them I’m just clicking ‘Ignore, Ignore, Ignore.’”
She took only minor interest in (Lil) Green Patch until learning recently from a reporter that the game’s promise to help save rainforests and fight global warming was genuine.
“I’ll probably look into it a little more now,” Marble said. “I just finished tending my garden, whatever that really means.”
Many appeals on social networks have drawn lots of attention but few dollars.
“You often see where 20,000 people have joined a cause and it’s raised US$200,” said Jim Tobin, president of Ignite Social Media, a promotional company in Cary, North Carolina.
The (Lil) Green Patch game has done better than most, generating US$162,150 in little more than a year, said Sue Citro, digital membership director for The Nature Conservancy. It is among the most popular applications that Facebook can add to their profiles, with nearly 6 million active users monthly, according to Facebook.
Players plant virtual “gardens” with flowers and fruits sent by friends and send plants to them in return. Ads are shown alongside the game. Green Patch Inc, the Mountain View, California, developer of the game, donates a portion of ad revenue to The Nature Conservancy’s rainforest preservation campaign.
It’s yet another avenue for raising money and awareness, supplementing direct online contributions generated by running ads and sending e-mail to past donors. Social networks can potentially be more effective because they are cheaper and involve referrals from friends.
“A lot of the world is transitioning to using not just the Internet, but the socially connected Internet,” said David King, Green Patch’s founder. “We see this as the beginning of a whole movement where people are able to connect with each other and with foundations representing the causes that are important to them.”
Despite being among the more lucrative Facebook applications, (Lil) Green Patch accounts for less than 3 percent of The Nature Conservancy’s online fundraising — which itself generates just 10 percent of all individual donations to the group, Citro said.
Yet the conservancy is less concerned with raising big bucks than with planting seeds for future support from the younger generation active on social networks.
“It’s really a great branding tool,” Citro said. “It’s helping spread the word, educating people about our organization and its mission.”
The group recommends its social-networking activities to past donors who cannot afford to give cash because of the bad economy but still want to help, she said.
Even if social-networking sites draw relatively little money now, it’s imperative for nonprofits to explore them, said Melissa Brown, associate director of research for the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
Russia and Ukraine have exchanged prisoners of war in the latest such swap that saw the release of hundreds of captives and was brokered with the help of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), officials said on Monday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said that 189 Ukrainian prisoners, including military personnel, border guards and national guards — along with two civilians — were freed. He thanked the UAE for helping negotiate the exchange. The Russian Ministry of Defense said that 150 Russian troops were freed from captivity as part of the exchange in which each side released 150 people. The reason for the discrepancy in numbers
A shark attack off Egypt’s Red Sea coast killed a tourist and injured another, authorities said on Sunday, with an Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs source identifying both as Italian nationals. “Two foreigners were attacked by a shark in the northern Marsa Alam area, which led to the injury of one and the death of the other,” the Egyptian Ministry of Environment said in a statement. A source at the Italian foreign ministry said that the man killed was a 48-year-old resident of Rome. The injured man was 69 years old. They were both taken to hospital in Port Ghalib, about 50km north
The foreign ministers of Germany, France and Poland on Tuesday expressed concern about “the political crisis” in Georgia, two days after Mikheil Kavelashvili was formally inaugurated as president of the South Caucasus nation, cementing the ruling party’s grip in what the opposition calls a blow to the country’s EU aspirations and a victory for former imperial ruler Russia. “We strongly condemn last week’s violence against peaceful protesters, media and opposition leaders, and recall Georgian authorities’ responsibility to respect human rights and protect fundamental freedoms, including the freedom to assembly and media freedom,” the three ministers wrote in a joint statement. In reaction
BARRIER BLAME: An aviation expert questioned the location of a solid wall past the end of the runway, saying that it was ‘very bad luck for this particular airplane’ A team of US investigators, including representatives from Boeing, on Tuesday examined the site of a plane crash that killed 179 people in South Korea, while authorities were conducting safety inspections on all Boeing 737-800 aircraft operated by the country’s airlines. All but two of the 181 people aboard the Boeing 737-800 operated by South Korean budget airline Jeju Air died in Sunday’s crash. Video showed the aircraft, without its landing gear deployed, crash-landed on its belly and overshoot a runaway at Muan International Airport before it slammed into a barrier and burst into flames. The plane was seen having engine trouble.
RSS