The top US commander in Afghanistan has asked for 10,000 more troops to be deployed to the country next year, senior US defense officials said on Wednesday.
The extra troops would add to a US force that is already expected to grow this year by 30,000 to stand at 68,000 troops as the US and NATO try to get a grip on rising violence by Taliban militants and other insurgents.
US President Barack Obama unveiled his administration’s strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan last week, pledging more troops to train Afghan forces, more civilians to help Afghanistan’s development and more economic aid for Pakistan.
In February, Obama approved the deployment of 17,000 more US troops — mainly combat forces — to Afghanistan.
He does not need to decide on the extra forces requested by US Army General David McKiernan until this autumn and wants to take stock of the war before doing so, said Michele Flournoy, under secretary of defense for policy.
“The president made every decision that he needed to make at this point in time and I think those other decisions will be made at the appropriate time,” she told the US Senate’s armed services committee. “Because we are redoubling our effort in Afghanistan and we expect to be making progress throughout this year, we also expect the commander to be reassessing his needs over time.”
US Army General David Petraeus, the head of US Central Command, said Afghanistan and Pakistan represented the “most urgent problem set” in his area of responsibility, which stretches from the Middle East into central and South Asia.
“There will be nothing easy about the way ahead in Afghanistan or Pakistan,” he told the committee. “The extremists that have established sanctuaries in the rugged border areas not only contribute to the deterioration of security in eastern and southern Afghanistan. They also pose an ever-more serious threat to Pakistan’s very existence.”
US Senator John McCain, the ranking Republican on the committee, praised Obama’s strategy but criticized the administration for not including a new target for larger Afghan security forces and not approving McKiernan’s request.
“It would be far, far better to announce that we will have the additional 10,000 troops dispatched. They will clearly be needed,” he said. “It is obvious that the Afghan army would have to be around 250,000. It’s a big country.”
The Afghan army is currently set to grow to 134,000 members by the end of 2011. The Obama administration has indicated it favors a larger force but has not set a new target.
“To dribble out these decisions, I think, can create the impression of incrementalism,” McCain said.
Later in the hearing, Flournoy took issue with that description.
“I would never have used the phrase incrementalism to describe this,” she said. “This is a very strong commitment on the military side and on the civilian side, and the economic side, by this president to try to make this mission successful.”
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS