Russia made good on its threat to cut off all natural gas supplies to Ukraine — but the two uneasy neighbors took great pains to make sure their contract dispute would not leave Europe short of gas just as winter set in.
Overshadowing their confrontation was the specter of 2006, when a similar dispute interrupted gas shipments to many European countries for three days. But both Russia and Ukraine now have strong interests in proving to Europe they can be reliable energy partners, and they assured other European nations they would not be affected.
The cutoff was being closely watched in the EU, which depends on Russia for about a quarter of its gas — with some 80 percent of that delivered through pipelines controlled by Ukraine.
“I believe we are close to accepting a compromise solution,” Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko said in a statement on Thursday.
He said he expected talks to resume in the next day or two and to be concluded by Orthodox Christmas next Wednesday.
White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe urged both sides to keep in mind the humanitarian implications of any interruption of gas supply in the winter.
“The predictable flow of energy to Ukraine and the rest of Europe under market-based, transparent conditions is essential for stability and reliability in regional and global energy markets,” Johndroe said.
Russia’s gas monopoly Gazprom shut off gas supplies after talks broke down over Ukraine’s payments for past shipments and a new price contract for this year.
In 2006, much of the blame for the supply disruption fell on Russia, which was accused of using its energy resources as a political weapon to punish Ukraine’s Western-leaning government.
European countries then began to question Russia’s reliability as an energy partner and look for ways to diversify their supplies.
On Thursday, Gazprom said it had boosted deliveries through other pipelines to Western Europe.
Ukraine’s reputation suffered less in 2006, although it was accused of siphoning off gas intended for Europe. This time, though, Ukraine’s position has appeared weaker, in part because of the failure of its president and prime minister, bitter political rivals, to agree on a common negotiating position.
But early on Thursday, Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko issued a joint statement with a new pricing offer. They said Ukraine has enough gas in storage facilities to meet its own needs “for a long time” and stressed that they would guarantee the uninterrupted transit of natural gas through Ukrainian territory to Europe.
Since the 2006 crisis, European countries have built up their gas reserves and would be unlikely to see any disruption for several weeks, said Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Uralsib bank.
The deadlock over gas supplies reflects the deep political split between Moscow and Kiev. Yushchenko has angered the Kremlin through his efforts to build ties to Western Europe and his support of Georgia in its war with Russia.
But the division within the Ukrainian leadership has proved a bigger obstacle.
“A big reason we got to this point is that there has been no clear management of the situation in Kiev,” Weafer said.
The president had wanted to avoid a conflict so as not to risk losing good will with the EU, Weafer said, while the prime minister seemed inclined to push the dispute to the point where she could intervene at the last minute.
Gazprom had demanded Ukraine pay off all of a US$2.1 billion debt and sign a deal setting prices for this year’s deliveries by midnight on Wednesday. Neither was done.
Ukraine’s Naftogaz said it covered the debt when it transferred US$1.5 billion on Tuesday. Gazprom, however, claims Ukraine owes US$600 million more in fines.
Stickier issues are how much Ukraine will pay for natural gas this year and if Russia will pay more to use Ukraine’s pipelines.
After first insisting that Ukraine pay US$418 per 1,000m3 of gas this year, more than double the US$179.50 it paid the previous year, Gazprom offered a contract on Wednesday with gas set at US$250.
Ukrainian officials countered early on Thursday with an offer to pay US$201 if Russia agreed to raise the price it pays to use Ukraine’s pipelines from US$1.70 to US$2 per 1,000m3 per 100km.
Later on Thursday, Naftogaz director Oleh Dubina said Ukraine was willing to pay US$235, with a transit fee of US$1.80.
But Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller then issued a statement saying since Ukraine had rejected the US$250 offer, it would be charged the current European price of US$418.
The price most West European countries pay, however, is set to fall sharply in the spring as a result of the steep drop in the price of oil.
Volodymyr Soprykin, energy analyst with the Razumkov center in Kiev, predicted the dispute would be solved in the coming days.
He said Ukraine was forced to rely on its reserves, which were running out, while Russia would eventually have too much gas in its pipelines and would have to shut down or put its gas exploration wells on standby, a technically complicated and costly ordeal.
“Gas wars are highly bad for both sides, a compromise will be found,” Soprykin said.
When Shanghai-based designer Guo Qingshan posted a vacation photo on Valentine’s Day and captioned it “Puppy Mountain,” it became a sensation in China and even created a tourist destination. Guo had gone on a hike while visiting his hometown of Yichang in central China’s Hubei Province late last month. When reviewing the photographs, he saw something he had not noticed before: A mountain shaped like a dog’s head rested on the ground next to the Yangtze River, its snout perched at the water’s edge. “It was so magical and cute. I was so excited and happy when I discovered it,” Guo said.
TURNAROUND: The Liberal Party had trailed the Conservatives by a wide margin, but that was before Trump threatened to make Canada the US’ 51st state Canada’s ruling Liberals, who a few weeks ago looked certain to lose an election this year, are mounting a major comeback amid the threat of US tariffs and are tied with their rival Conservatives, according to three new polls. An Ipsos survey released late on Tuesday showed that the left-leaning Liberals have 38 percent public support and the official opposition center-right Conservatives have 36 percent. The Liberals have overturned a 26-point deficit in six weeks, and run advertisements comparing the Conservative leader to Trump. The Conservative strategy had long been to attack unpopular Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but last month he
PROBE: Last week, Romanian prosecutors launched a criminal investigation against presidential candidate Calin Georgescu accusing him of supporting fascist groups Tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Romania’s capital on Saturday in the latest anti-government demonstration by far-right groups after a top court canceled a presidential election in the EU country last year. Protesters converged in front of the government building in Bucharest, waving Romania’s tricolor flags and chanting slogans such as “down with the government” and “thieves.” Many expressed support for Calin Georgescu, who emerged as the frontrunner in December’s canceled election, and demanded they be resumed from the second round. George Simion, the leader of the far-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR), which organized the protest,
ECONOMIC DISTORTION? The US commerce secretary’s remarks echoed Elon Musk’s arguments that spending by the government does not create value for the economy US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that government spending could be separated from GDP reports, in response to questions about whether the spending cuts pushed by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency could possibly cause an economic downturn. “You know that governments historically have messed with GDP,” Lutnick said on Fox News Channel’s Sunday Morning Futures. “They count government spending as part of GDP. So I’m going to separate those two and make it transparent.” Doing so could potentially complicate or distort a fundamental measure of the US economy’s health. Government spending is traditionally included in the GDP because
RSS