Little separates Democratic Senator Barack Obama and Republican Senator John McCain of global warming. That means victory for either of them in the Nov. 4 elections will signal a sea change in the way the US addresses the issue.
Both agree that climate change results from human activity. Both favor cutting US emissions by 2020 and deepening them by 2050. Both want a cap-and-trade system to achieve this — something US President George W. Bush has bitterly opposed.
“In my opinion, there are more similarities than differences,” said Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, an independent think tank in Washington.
“Whoever will be in the White House in January, it will be a different world on the climate front,” she said. “They all accept the science and both have the same idea on what kind of program to have.”
McCain’s position on climate change stems from the Climate Stewardship Acts, which co-sponsored with fellow US senator Joseph Lieberman and which Obama — also a senator — supported before they failed to get enough votes to clear the Senate.
Notwithstanding their common ground on principles, the rivals do differ on details.
Obama, the Democratic hopeful, wants greenhouse gas emissions to be slashed by 80 percent within 50 years. McCain, in the Republican camp, prefers 60 to 65 percent.
Obama also wants to see 25 percent of US electricity needs met by renewable sources by 2025 — a target that McCain opposes.
Finally, McCain is more gung-ho on offshore oil drilling — a feeling shared by his running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin — and supports the construction of 45 new nuclear power stations by 2030.
Nuclear today accounts for 20 percent of US electricity output. But since the 1978 accident at the Three Mile Island facility in Pennsylvania, no new nuclear power stations have gone up on US soil.
Though not opposed to nuclear energy, Obama has reservations on how to deal with radioactive waste.
When it comes to international cooperation, Claussen sees little difference between Obama and McCain, given how they concur on the need to conclude a global agreement to address climate change.
“Both say we need to have a global agreement,” said Claussen, a former undersecretary of state for environmental issues during Bill Clinton’s Democratic presidency.
“They are both reasonably realistic about what you might expect or get from the big developing countries like China and India,” she said.
Claussen expects that, in the first six months of the new presidency, Obama or McCain will set down either a set of principles or a piece of legislation to be sent to Congress, setting out their ideas for the way forward.
But she doubts the incoming president will have time enough to have a detailed position worked out and negotiated with other nations before the next global climate change conference in Copenhagen at the end of next year.
She cautioned Europeans against unrealistic expectations when they call for developed nations to bring emissions down 20 to 40 percent from 1990 levels, when the US is currently 16 percent over that marker.
The Sierra Club, the biggest environmental group in the US, which endorsed Obama in July, says it is “excited” by the fact that, for the first time, both White House candidates want to act on global warming.
“The question is no longer, ‘Should we do something about global warming?’” spokesman David Willett said. “It has become, ‘What exactly are we going to do?’ That is progress.”
“The general scientific consensus is that to prevent the worst impact of global warming, we need to reduce our emissions of CO² by 80 percent in the next 50 years — and that is the target that Obama sets in his plan.”
Frank Maisano, from Washington lobbying firm Bracewell Giuliani, which represents major energy producers, said it remains to be seen how lofty goals can be fulfilled in the context of the US economic downtown and the worst financial crisis since the 1930s.
“The question is not to listen to what they say, but what they try to do in their first 100 days or first year in office,” he said.
People with missing teeth might be able to grow new ones, said Japanese dentists, who are testing a pioneering drug they hope will offer an alternative to dentures and implants. Unlike reptiles and fish, which usually replace their fangs on a regular basis, it is widely accepted that humans and most other mammals only grow two sets of teeth. However, hidden underneath our gums are the dormant buds of a third generation, said Katsu Takahashi, head of oral surgery at the Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital in Osaka, Japan. His team launched clinical trials at Kyoto University Hospital in October, administering an experimental
Ukraine’s military intelligence agency and the Pentagon on Monday said that some North Korean troops have been killed during combat against Ukrainian forces in Russia’s Kursk border region. Those are the first reported casualties since the US and Ukraine announced that North Korea had sent 10,000 to 12,000 troops to Russia to help it in the almost three-year war. Ukraine’s military intelligence agency said that about 30 North Korean troops were killed or wounded during a battle with the Ukrainian army at the weekend. The casualties occurred around three villages in Kursk, where Russia has for four months been trying to quash a
ROYAL TARGET: After Prince Andrew lost much of his income due to his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, he became vulnerable to foreign agents, an author said British lawmakers failed to act on advice to tighten security laws that could have prevented an alleged Chinese spy from targeting Britain’s Prince Andrew, a former attorney general has said. Dominic Grieve, a former lawmaker who chaired the British Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) until 2019, said ministers were advised five years ago to introduce laws to criminalize foreign agents, but failed to do so. Similar laws exist in the US and Australia. “We remain without an important weapon in our armory,” Grieve said. “We asked for [this law] in the context of the Russia inquiry report” — which accused the government
A rash of unexplained drone sightings in the skies above New Jersey has left locals rattled and sent US officials scrambling for answers. Breathless local news reports have amplified the anxious sky-gazing and wild speculation — interspersing blurry, dark clips from social media with irate locals calling for action. For weeks now, the distinctive blinking lights and whirling rotors of large uncrewed aerial vehicles have been spotted across the state west of New York. However, military brass, elected representatives and investigators have been unable to explain the recurring UFO phenomenon. Sam Lugo, 23, who works in the Club Studio gym in New Jersey’s Bergen
RSS