India and the US have moved significantly closer to implementing a landmark nuclear deal with the approval of an inspection plan by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The Washington-New Delhi pact would reverse more than three decades of US policy. It calls for allowing the sale of atomic fuel and technology to India, a country that has not signed international nonproliferation accords — and has tested nuclear weapons.
To implement the deal, India must strike separate agreements with the IAEA and with the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NPG) of countries that export nuclear material. It would then go to the US Congress for approval.
Both capitals, New Delhi and Washington, hailed adoption of the so-called IAEA safeguards agreement on Friday, which will allow UN monitors access to 14 existing or planned Indian nuclear reactors by 2014.
“We believe this is important, not only for us and our bilateral relationship with India, but for rest of the world,” US State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos told reporters in Washington.
The White House urged the NSG to act quickly, saying the administration expects to submit the deal to Congress later this year.
“This is an important day for India, and for our civil nuclear initiative for the resumption of India’s cooperation with our friends abroad,” Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said in the Sri Lankan capital, Colombo.
The IAEA’s 35-member board of governors approved the plan by consensus despite criticism that ambiguous wording could end up limiting international oversight of India’s reactors, possibly help supply India’s arms programs with fissile material and that it would lead to the undermining the international nonproliferation regime.
Energy agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei welcomed the agreement.
“It’s good for our collective effort to move toward a world free from nuclear weapons,” ElBaradei said.
Britain, in welcoming IAEA approval, said the US-India deal would make a “significant contribution to energy and climate security.”
But Austria said it had stood firm in its stance against nuclear energy and said it had joined other “like-minded” nations in requesting a legally binding list of nuclear facilities to be inspected. Diplomats who were in the meeting said Ireland and Switzerland also expressed concerns, among others.
In a statement, the Austrian Foreign Ministry also warned that the board’s approval did not in any way set a precedent for similar action by the NSG.
The NSG — to which the US belongs — bans exports of nuclear fuel and technology to nuclear weapons states like India and Pakistan that have not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and do not have full safeguard agreements allowing the IAEA to inspect their facilities.
But the group appears willing to consider a waiver for India, in part due to lobbying from Washington. Diplomats suggest a meeting could take place within weeks.
Anil Kakodkar, India’s Atomic Energy Commission chief, told reporters he hoped the group would grant New Delhi a “clean, unconditional exemption.”
Daryl Kimball of the Washington-based Arms Control Association urged the group to call on India to sign a legally binding ban on nuclear testing and to bar the transfer of uranium enrichment and plutonium processing technology, which could be used for making weapons.
While IAEA approval was largely expected, “the NSG is going to be much tougher,” Kimball said.
Iran, which is under international pressure over its nuclear program, was also among those with reservations about the plan. It is not a member of the board of governors but requested time to speak, alongside several other non-board members.
It expressed concern that the US was trying to set a precedent and pave the way for Israel — which also has not signed nonproliferation accords — to continue what Iran called “its clandestine weapons activities,” according an Iranian statement before the approval.
Ali Ashgar Soltanieh, Iran’s top representative to the UN agency, said in his speech that Tehran was worried about what he called a US double standard, and said it would continue to undermine the credibility, integrity and universality of the NPT.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Chinese authorities said they began live-fire exercises in the Gulf of Tonkin on Monday, only days after Vietnam announced a new line marking what it considers its territory in the body of water between the nations. The Chinese Maritime Safety Administration said the exercises would be focused on the Beibu Gulf area, closer to the Chinese side of the Gulf of Tonkin, and would run until tomorrow evening. It gave no further details, but the drills follow an announcement last week by Vietnam establishing a baseline used to calculate the width of its territorial waters in the Gulf of Tonkin. State-run Vietnam News
Four decades after they were forced apart, US-raised Adamary Garcia and her birth mother on Saturday fell into each other’s arms at the airport in Santiago, Chile. Without speaking, they embraced tearfully: A rare reunification for one the thousands of Chileans taken from their mothers as babies and given up for adoption abroad. “The worst is over,” Edita Bizama, 64, said as she beheld her daughter for the first time since her birth 41 years ago. Garcia had flown to Santiago with four other women born in Chile and adopted in the US. Reports have estimated there were 20,000 such cases from 1950 to
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
RSS