The future of India’s coalition government and a controversial nuclear deal with the US were hanging in the balance yesterday as parliament opened debate ahead of a key confidence vote.
The Indian government would collapse and early elections would be called if the coalition of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh were to lose a vote today, and experts said the outcome was far too close to call.
Singh stirred up anger among his left-wing and communist allies by signing a nuclear accord with the US that his government insists was essential to meet the energy needs of India’s fast-growing economy and its 1 billion people.
PHOTO: EPA
Left-wingers, who sparked the vote by withdrawing their support, said the deal tied traditionally non-aligned India too close to the US, and would compromise the country’s nuclear weapons program.
After days of trying to woo even tiny parties with just a handful of votes, Singh voiced confidence that his government would survive and see through its last year in office.
“We will prove our majority on the floor of the House,” he told reporters outside the Lok Sabha, or parliament.
The government would need a simple majority of votes, but opposition parties — including the left and the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) — were equally confident they could push the world’s largest democracy into early elections.
If the government were to lose the vote, elections must be held within six months.
The race was so tight, and the stakes so high, that the government has let six MPs serving jail terms out to vote. Meanwhile the opposition has paid for charter flights to bring in ailing lawmakers, politicians said.
“The government is today like a patient in an intensive care unit. The first question naturally asked is, ‘is he going to survive or not?’” BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani said as the marathon debate opened.
The communists and BJP were also trying to widen the terms of the debate.
They have been speaking out against rising food and fuel prices — inflation has been up to about 12 percent lately — and arguing that hundreds of millions of poor have been left behind by India’s economic boom.
But the core issue was the nuclear deal — a topic spanning India’s energy security as well as its place in the world.
India, which tested nuclear weapons in 1974 and 1998 and refused to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, has been barred from buying nuclear technology and fuel.
The deal would allow such purchases but subject India’s civilian nuclear sites to international controls — aimed at ensuring that any purchases are not diverted for military uses.
Opponents have said the deal would compromise India’s position as a beacon of neutrality, and that the requisite UN inspections would limit India’s ability to develop its weapons program to deter its main regional rival Pakistan.
They also argued that there were strings attached — and doing a deal with Washington would undermine its freedom to buy oil and gas from countries like Iran, or shop for armaments with traditional suppliers like Russia.
“We are not against nuclear energy. We are not against a very close relationship with America. But we would never like India to become party to an agreement which is unequal,” the BJP’s Advani told parliament.
“This deal makes us a subservient partner. It makes India a junior partner,” he said, adding the BJP wanted the deal to be renegotiated but not scrapped.
The Philippines yesterday said its coast guard would acquire 40 fast patrol craft from France, with plans to deploy some of them in disputed areas of the South China Sea. The deal is the “largest so far single purchase” in Manila’s ongoing effort to modernize its coast guard, with deliveries set to start in four years, Philippine Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Ronnie Gil Gavan told a news conference. He declined to provide specifications for the vessels, which Manila said would cost 25.8 billion pesos (US$440 million), to be funded by development aid from the French government. He said some of the vessels would
CARGO PLANE VECTOR: Officials said they believe that attacks involving incendiary devices on planes was the work of Russia’s military intelligence agency the GRU Western security officials suspect Russian intelligence was behind a plot to put incendiary devices in packages on cargo planes headed to North America, including one that caught fire at a courier hub in Germany and another that ignited in a warehouse in England. Poland last month said that it had arrested four people suspected to be linked to a foreign intelligence operation that carried out sabotage and was searching for two others. Lithuania’s prosecutor general Nida Grunskiene on Tuesday said that there were an unspecified number of people detained in several countries, offering no elaboration. The events come as Western officials say
A plane bringing Israeli soccer supporters home from Amsterdam landed at Israel’s Ben Gurion airport on Friday after a night of violence that Israeli and Dutch officials condemned as “anti-Semitic.” Dutch police said 62 arrests were made in connection with the violence, which erupted after a UEFA Europa League soccer tie between Amsterdam club Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Israeli flag carrier El Al said it was sending six planes to the Netherlands to bring the fans home, after the first flight carrying evacuees landed on Friday afternoon, the Israeli Airports Authority said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also ordered
Former US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi said if US President Joe Biden had ended his re-election bid sooner, the Democratic Party could have held a competitive nominating process to choose his replacement. “Had the president gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race,” Pelosi said in an interview on Thursday published by the New York Times the next day. “The anticipation was that, if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary,” she said. Pelosi said she thought the Democratic candidate, US Vice President Kamala Harris, “would have done
RSS