It is a sign of the times that the craziest thing I have seen this week was not Daryl Hannah licking surplus fuel off the petrol cap (or whatever she would call it) of her 1960s-era Chevrolet El Camino.
“It has a toxicity level somewhere between table salt and maple syrup,” declared Madame Splash, as she slurped biodiesel sourced from recycled restaurant cooking oil.
Drinking the stuff that fuels your car is triumphantly sane compared with the thinking that is now driving the race to exploit oil and gas reserves in the Arctic.
The warming planet is causing ice to melt at the poles. This is resulting in more of the Arctic becoming ice-free. This is great news! Less ice means easier access to Arctic oil.
Let’s be quite clear about the thinking here. Global warming, caused in part by the burning of fossil fuels, is irreparably changing our planet.
But don’t worry. It also opens up opportunities — to extract and burn more fossil fuels.
If this is what passes for solutions, we’re sunk.
What it shows is that the two faces of our great global energy crises have become messily conflated — blended in the public mind — when their solutions are so different as to be almost opposite.
The bigger issue is global warming. Lives, wars, ecosystems, disease patterns, economic growth, migration patterns, the future of species — nothing is immune.
But it’s the price of oil, not climate change, that’s the No. 1 issue in the US and pretty much everywhere else. People are looking to their politicians to “do something.” The rallying cry is “More drilling!”
But the professionals know cheap oil is gone and won’t be coming back. And no amount of drilling will alter that fact.
Consider this. Oil companies have a strong interest in telling people that oil prices will come down. That way, people are not inclined to change their fundamental habits; they’ll just ride out the bumps until fuel is cheap again.
So when Big Oil is not making that claim, we should sober up and listen.
BP chief executive officer Tony Hayward says trillions of dollars of new investment will be needed to access the 1.24 trillion barrels of oil he believes still exist on the planet.
Even assuming that investment comes — and doubtless it will — that oil will run out in a little more than 40 years at current consumption. And it’s worth noting that in this current debate, Hayward counts among the optimists.
The “easy oil” from Alaska and the North Sea that eased the 1970s oil shock can’t help this time.
“There is hardly any additional access to easy oil,” Shell chief Jeroen van der Veer says. “Most of the new supplies will be difficult oil.”
Iraq, ironically, shows promise. There’s drilling that can be done off the beaches of California and Florida. And yes, lest we forget, Russia, the US, Canada, Norway and Denmark — the five states that have rights to claim in the Arctic — have all formally lodged papers with the UN body that will ultimately decide who gets to explore where.
None of these options is cheap, safe or politically easy. All simply delay the inevitable. And all contribute to climate change. Make no mistake, expensive oil is hard to take, for commuting workers, for middle class families, for businesses — but especially for the poor on the planet who feel the costs most keenly in the rising price of their food.
But as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, the man in charge of some of the most car-dependent people on Earth, puts it: “To look for new ways to feed our addiction is not the answer.”
Is he right?
My question is this: Would it be a good thing for oil prices to stay just where they are?
Let me know. Post a comment to “Sound Off” below my blog at www.cnn.com/goinggreen.
Hugh Riminton’s “Going Green” appears in the Taipei Times every day this week until Saturday. CNN’s special coverage of “Going Green: Search for Solutions” continues until Sunday.
Also See: UN environmental agency hails green energy ‘gold rush’
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to