It is a sign of the times that the craziest thing I have seen this week was not Daryl Hannah licking surplus fuel off the petrol cap (or whatever she would call it) of her 1960s-era Chevrolet El Camino.
“It has a toxicity level somewhere between table salt and maple syrup,” declared Madame Splash, as she slurped biodiesel sourced from recycled restaurant cooking oil.
Drinking the stuff that fuels your car is triumphantly sane compared with the thinking that is now driving the race to exploit oil and gas reserves in the Arctic.
The warming planet is causing ice to melt at the poles. This is resulting in more of the Arctic becoming ice-free. This is great news! Less ice means easier access to Arctic oil.
Let’s be quite clear about the thinking here. Global warming, caused in part by the burning of fossil fuels, is irreparably changing our planet.
But don’t worry. It also opens up opportunities — to extract and burn more fossil fuels.
If this is what passes for solutions, we’re sunk.
What it shows is that the two faces of our great global energy crises have become messily conflated — blended in the public mind — when their solutions are so different as to be almost opposite.
The bigger issue is global warming. Lives, wars, ecosystems, disease patterns, economic growth, migration patterns, the future of species — nothing is immune.
But it’s the price of oil, not climate change, that’s the No. 1 issue in the US and pretty much everywhere else. People are looking to their politicians to “do something.” The rallying cry is “More drilling!”
But the professionals know cheap oil is gone and won’t be coming back. And no amount of drilling will alter that fact.
Consider this. Oil companies have a strong interest in telling people that oil prices will come down. That way, people are not inclined to change their fundamental habits; they’ll just ride out the bumps until fuel is cheap again.
So when Big Oil is not making that claim, we should sober up and listen.
BP chief executive officer Tony Hayward says trillions of dollars of new investment will be needed to access the 1.24 trillion barrels of oil he believes still exist on the planet.
Even assuming that investment comes — and doubtless it will — that oil will run out in a little more than 40 years at current consumption. And it’s worth noting that in this current debate, Hayward counts among the optimists.
The “easy oil” from Alaska and the North Sea that eased the 1970s oil shock can’t help this time.
“There is hardly any additional access to easy oil,” Shell chief Jeroen van der Veer says. “Most of the new supplies will be difficult oil.”
Iraq, ironically, shows promise. There’s drilling that can be done off the beaches of California and Florida. And yes, lest we forget, Russia, the US, Canada, Norway and Denmark — the five states that have rights to claim in the Arctic — have all formally lodged papers with the UN body that will ultimately decide who gets to explore where.
None of these options is cheap, safe or politically easy. All simply delay the inevitable. And all contribute to climate change. Make no mistake, expensive oil is hard to take, for commuting workers, for middle class families, for businesses — but especially for the poor on the planet who feel the costs most keenly in the rising price of their food.
But as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, the man in charge of some of the most car-dependent people on Earth, puts it: “To look for new ways to feed our addiction is not the answer.”
Is he right?
My question is this: Would it be a good thing for oil prices to stay just where they are?
Let me know. Post a comment to “Sound Off” below my blog at www.cnn.com/goinggreen.
Hugh Riminton’s “Going Green” appears in the Taipei Times every day this week until Saturday. CNN’s special coverage of “Going Green: Search for Solutions” continues until Sunday.
Also See: UN environmental agency hails green energy ‘gold rush’
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
Four decades after they were forced apart, US-raised Adamary Garcia and her birth mother on Saturday fell into each other’s arms at the airport in Santiago, Chile. Without speaking, they embraced tearfully: A rare reunification for one the thousands of Chileans taken from their mothers as babies and given up for adoption abroad. “The worst is over,” Edita Bizama, 64, said as she beheld her daughter for the first time since her birth 41 years ago. Garcia had flown to Santiago with four other women born in Chile and adopted in the US. Reports have estimated there were 20,000 such cases from 1950 to
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS