Almost 33,000 Alaskan victims of the disastrous Exxon Valdez oil spill could see their court-ordered payments reduced by more than half, to about US$30,000 each, if the Supreme Court hands Exxon Mobil Corp a partial victory in a long legal fight over punitive damages.
The justices reached no firm conclusions in court on Wednesday, but they appeared to agree with Exxon that the US$2.5 billion, or US$75,000 a person, ordered by a federal court is excessive punishment for the massive 1989 spill.
Two justices, who could hold the balance of power in this case, suggested a payout of about US$1 billion might be appropriate.
PHOTO: AFP
There was little talk in court of the plight of Alaskans who depended on the area's environment for their paychecks or of Exxon's run of record profits. Neither has much to do with the legal principles that underlie the case.
The award represents less than three weeks' worth of Exxon profit, which was US$11.7 billion in the last three months of last year.
Still, Exxon has vigorously fought to knock down or erase the punitive damages verdict by a jury in Alaska in 1994 for the accident that dumped 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound. The environmental disaster fouled 1,930km of Alaskan coastline.
The verdict has been cut in half once by a federal appeals court.
The problem for the people, businesses and governments who waged the lengthy legal fight against Exxon is that the Supreme Court in recent years has become more receptive to limiting punitive damages awards. The Exxon Valdez case differs from the others in that it involves issues peculiar to laws governing accidents on the water.
But several justices said limits could be appropriate in this context too.
Overall, Exxon has paid US$3.4 billion in fines, penalties, cleanup costs, claims and other expenses resulting from the worst oil spill in US history.
"Exxon gained nothing by what went wrong in this case and paid dearly for it," Exxon lawyer Walter Dellinger said, in urging the court to throw out the punitive damages judgment that has been upheld by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Law professor Jeffrey Fisher said each of the commercial fishermen, Native Alaskans, landowners, businesses and local governments he represents has received about US$15,000 so far "for having their lives and livelihood destroyed and haven't received a dime of emotional-distress damages."
Fisher said nothing in prior Supreme Court decisions should cause the justices to overturn the US$2.5 billion award, about US$75,000 for each plaintiff.
It was less clear how the court would rule about whether the company should have to pay damages at all under the Clean Water Act and centuries-old laws governing shipping. Justice Samuel Alito, who owns Exxon stock, is not taking part in the case. A 4-4 split on that or any issue would leave the appeals court ruling in place.
The key element there is whether Exxon can be held liable at all for the acts of Exxon Valdez captain Joseph Hazelwood. Hazelwood was not on the ship's bridge when the accident occurred and had been drinking shortly before it left port, both in violation of Coast Guard rules and company policy.
"What more can the corporation do other than say, `Here is our policies'? And try to implement them?" Chief Justice John Roberts said.
Fisher said Exxon had many warnings over three years that Hazelwood, an alcoholic, was drinking and that it knew that "putting a drunken master in charge of a supertanker was a potential for disaster and incalculably raised the chances of a disaster and a catastrophic spill occurring."
Two brothers from Cordova, Alaska, were in line in front of the Supreme Court on Wednesday, waiting to watch the arguments inside.
Commercial fisherman Steve Copeland said he cannot afford to retire because his business has never recovered from the steep decline it suffered due to the disaster.
His brother, Tom, said Exxon "needs to get told they need to be a better corporate citizen."
People with missing teeth might be able to grow new ones, said Japanese dentists, who are testing a pioneering drug they hope will offer an alternative to dentures and implants. Unlike reptiles and fish, which usually replace their fangs on a regular basis, it is widely accepted that humans and most other mammals only grow two sets of teeth. However, hidden underneath our gums are the dormant buds of a third generation, said Katsu Takahashi, head of oral surgery at the Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital in Osaka, Japan. His team launched clinical trials at Kyoto University Hospital in October, administering an experimental
IVY LEAGUE GRADUATE: Suspect Luigi Nicholas Mangione, whose grandfather was a self-made real-estate developer and philanthropist, had a life of privilege The man charged with murder in the killing of the CEO of UnitedHealthcare made it clear he was not going to make things easy on authorities, shouting unintelligibly and writhing in the grip of sheriff’s deputies as he was led into court and then objecting to being brought to New York to face trial. The displays of resistance on Tuesday were not expected to significantly delay legal proceedings for Luigi Nicholas Mangione, who was charged in last week’s Manhattan killing of Brian Thompson, the leader of the US’ largest medical insurance company. Little new information has come out about motivation,
‘MONSTROUS CRIME’: The killings were overseen by a powerful gang leader who was convinced his son’s illness was caused by voodoo practitioners, a civil organization said Nearly 200 people in Haiti were killed in brutal weekend violence reportedly orchestrated against voodoo practitioners, with the government on Monday condemning a massacre of “unbearable cruelty.” The killings in the capital, Port-au-Prince, were overseen by a powerful gang leader convinced that his son’s illness was caused by followers of the religion, the civil organization the Committee for Peace and Development (CPD) said. It was the latest act of extreme violence by powerful gangs that control most of the capital in the impoverished Caribbean country mired for decades in political instability, natural disasters and other woes. “He decided to cruelly punish all
NOTORIOUS JAIL: Even from a distance, prisoners maimed by torture, weakened by illness and emaciated by hunger, could be distinguished Armed men broke the bolts on the cell and the prisoners crept out: haggard, bewildered and scarcely believing that their years of torment in Syria’s most brutal jail were over. “What has happened?” asked one prisoner after another. “You are free, come out. It is over,” cried the voice of a man filming them on his telephone. “Bashar has gone. We have crushed him.” The dramatic liberation of Saydnaya prison came hours after rebels took the nearby capital, Damascus, having sent former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad fleeing after more than 13 years of civil war. In the video, dozens of
RSS