A federal appeals court dealt a near-fatal blow to an Islamic charity's lawsuit challenging the US administration's warrantless wiretapping program, concluding that a key piece of evidence is protected as a state secret.
The lawsuit, filed by the Oregon-based US arm of the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, alleged the National Security Agency (NSA) illegally listened to its calls.
The charity had wanted to introduce as evidence a top-secret call log they received mistakenly from the Treasury Department.
But the three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the log could not be used because it fell under the "state secrets" privilege invoked by the government, and without it, the court said, the foundation had little proof it was wiretapped.
The decision, which reversed a lower court ruling, was a victory for the White House, but it didn't entirely put the issue to rest.
The judges sent the case to the US District Court in San Francisco to determine whether the law governing the wiretapping of suspected terrorists trumps the state secrets law.
The foundation has been labeled a terrorist organization by the US government.
The appellate court's ruling also didn't resolve another lawsuit that more broadly challenges the warrantless wiretapping program.
An attorney for al-Haramain said he was pleased with the appellate court's ruling because it gave him another chance to bring a lawsuit under a different argument.
"This is back to the drawing board," lawyer John Eisenberg said. "My case is still very much alive and kicking."
The Department of Justice also applauded the court.
"The 9th Circuit upheld the government's position that release of this information would undermine the government's intelligence capabilities and compromise national security," Department of Justice spokesman Charles Miller said in a statement.
Al-Haramain lawyers voluntarily gave the top-secret document to FBI agents after the mistake was discovered.
The document was described by those who have seen it as an NSA log of calls it had intercepted between the foundation and its US lawyers.
The charity had argued that warrantless eavesdropping of telephone conversations between its directors and lawyers violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which established a secret court to issue top secret surveillance warrants authorized by a judge.
Earlier, a federal judge in Oregon ruled that the foundation's lawyers couldn't use the actual document to support their lawsuit but could use their memories of its contents to go forward.
The appeals court called that judge's ruling "a commendable effort to thread the needle," but said it still ran counter to the state secrets law, which precludes the disclosure of sensitive information in court that could jeopardize national security.
"Such an approach countenances a back door around the privilege and would eviscerate the state secret itself," Judge M. Margaret McKeown wrote for the panel. "Once properly invoked and judicially blessed, the state secrets privilege is not a half-way proposition."
In December 2005, the New York Times exposed the administration's warrantless wiretapping program.
That led to reports that the program included widespread interceptions of e-mail traffic and the secret collection of customer data from telecommunications companies without judicial permission.
Since then, hundreds of lawyers, journalists, telecommunications company customers and civil rights organizations have alleged that their right to privacy has been violated.
About 50 lawsuits were filed against the government and telecommunication companies for allegedly turning over customer account information.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS