Britain should take a much more robust and independent approach to the US, according to a Guardian poll published yesterday, which finds strong public opposition to UK Prime Minister Tony Blair's close working relationship with US President George W. Bush.
The wide-ranging survey of British attitudes to international affairs -- the first since the conflict between Lebanon and Israel started -- shows that a large majority of voters think Blair has made the special relationship too special.
Just 30 percent think the prime minister has got the relationship about right, against 63 percent saying he has tied Britain too closely to the US.
Conducted in the wake of the accidental broadcast of the prime minister's conversation with President Bush at the G8 summit, the poll finds opposition to this central element of the prime minister's foreign policy among supporters of all the main parties.
Even a majority of Labour supporters -- traditionally more supportive of Blair's foreign policy position -- think he has misjudged the relationship, with 54 percent saying Britain is too close to the US. Conservative voters -- 68 percent -- and supporters of the Liberal Democrats -- 83 percent -- are even more critical.
And voters are strongly critical of the scale of Israel's military operations in Lebanon, with 61 percent believing the country has overreacted to the threats it faces.
As pressure grows for a change of strategy, the poll finds that only 22 percent of voters believe Israel has reacted proportionately to the kidnapping of soldiers and other attacks from militant groups in southern Lebanon. Israel has repeatedly sought to assure the world that its actions are a legitimate response to threats to its own territory, including missile attacks on the north of the country.
The finding follows more than a week in which Blair has come under fire for echoing US caution about the practicality of an immediate ceasefire in the Middle East and for allying himself too closely to Israel.
At a press conference in London yesterday Blair defended his position and expressed sympathy for the plight of the Lebanese.
"What is occurring in Lebanon at the present time is a catastrophe. Anybody with any sense of humanity wants what is happening to stop and stop now," Blair said.
He added: "But if it is to stop, it must stop on both sides."
This did not amount to switch in policy but a change in emphasis, in part to answer critics who accuse him of being indifferent to the plight of the Lebanese.
A British official said: "He wants to make it clear he has the same feelings as everyone else but the job of government is to find an answer. The proof of the pudding is if we are able to find a way through."
Unlike other international leaders, Blair has refused to describe the Israeli attacks on Lebanon as disproportionate. But the official said there was a difference between what Blair said in public and what Blair and other members of the government said to the Israelis in private.
Public unease about Israel's approach is reflected in public attitudes to the Iraq war, with support for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein falling to a record low since military action began in March 2003.
Although a solid core of Labour supporters -- 48 percent -- still think the war was justified, overall only 36 percent of voters agree, a seven-point drop since the Guardian last asked the question in October 2004.
Older voters, conservatives and liberal democrats and people living in the south of England are particularly critical, suggesting the anti-war movement has a base of support well beyond student groups and the left.
Support for the war reached 63 percent in April 2003.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian