Scotland Yard will broaden its "loans for peerages" investigation to cover the Conservative party as well as Labour, the Guardian has learned.
The Metropolitan police team, led by the deputy assistant commissioner John Yates, has already requested documents and e-mails from Downing Street, the Cabinet Office and the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
But the range of the inquiry means that the Conservative party's loan arrangements will also have to be investigated. Tory sources admitted on Tuesday that the total amount raised by the party last year in loans was £24 million (US$42 million), and it is understood the party's high command has privately asked the contributors to go public.
Scotland Yard has refused to say which figs the detectives intend to interview as the inquiry unfolds, but it will not rule out speaking to Prime Minister Tony Blair. Westminster sources believe they will almost certainly speak to Lord Levy, the prime minister's chief fundraiser, and key players, such as the Labour Party Chairman Ian McCartney.
The members of parliament (MPs) who made the initial complaint about Labour and loans met Yates and his team of six at Scotland Yard yesterday to discuss the inquiry and to hand over a dossier fleshing out concerns.
After the meeting the Scottish Nationalist MP Angus MacNeil said: "The police are interested in crime. They are not interested in which party committed it ... After meeting people at Scotland Yard I would say anyone who has been involved in the selling of peerages should be shaking in their shoes."
MacNeil said he had been told the Tories would also be investigated.
A letter from Scotland Yard to the Public Administration Committee, which is also investigating Labour's loans, revealed that the Metropolitan Police had not ruled out pursuing charges of corruption.
"Whilst it may be too early for us to widen our investigation into the arena of corruption, I certainly have not ruled this out," wrote Yates. "I have indicated to you that many of the individuals that you wished to hear evidence from may be the very people that could be central to our criminal inquiry, either as witnesses or suspects."
Yates has urged the committee to stall its inquiry.
"My concerns were that your scrutiny could be viewed as an abuse of process in terms of fairness in any future potential criminal trial," the letter explains.
"I have consulted closely with senior lawyers from the Crown Prosecution Service about this matter," he wrote. They share my concerns and are happy for them to be articulated in this letter."
The Labour chairman of the committee, Tony Wright, insisted yesterday that his inquiry would continue regardless.
"There is no question that we shall proceed with the inquiry," he said. "In fact we shall widen it and call more people and we are prepared to summon people if they decline to attend in future."
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS