Three decades ago, a small group of religious pioneers installed themselves on a bare hillside to reclaim the biblical town of Beit El for the modern state of Israel.
A few kilometers inside the occupied West Bank, Beit El offered a special symbolism. Its name, meaning House of God, was chosen by Jacob 4,000 years ago because it was there that the Lord told him the land belonged to the Jews. The modern community grew into a settlement of 6,000 people, its residents certain no one could take from them what God had said was rightfully theirs.
Israel's voters appear ready to differ.
If, as expected, next week's general election returns a government led by Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his Kadima party, Beit El and other settlements home to tens of thousands of Jews are probably doomed. Olmert says he will sacrifice many isolated and smaller colonies -- often the ones most dear to the religious community -- to hold on to the settlements on the Israeli side of the West Bank barrier that will mark its future border.
"I'm pretty sure we're on the death list," said Chaim Silberstein, a resident of Beit El for 21 years. "We have rights. We are not occupiers. We are here for political, religious and historical reasons. But if Olmert is elected I think we are finished."
The future of Israel's West Bank colonies is at the heart of an election being fought over how best to separate from the Palestinians. The Israeli right would keep all the settlements and pen the Palestinians into cantons. The left would negotiate and pull back much closer to the 1967 border.
But the opinion polls show the strongest backing is for the strategy laid out by Kadima's founder, Ariel Sharon, before he fell into a coma -- to act unilaterally to withdraw behind the barrier and give up much of what lies beyond.
Silberstein, a "strategic estate agent" -- meaning he buys properties in Jerusalem from Arabs to establish Jewish communities -- says the skill of Kadima's strategy is that it divides the settlers.
About 70,000 would be moved to let 350,000 Israelis in the main settlement blocks to stay where they are.
"If they do try to give up the heartland of Israel they will be using the age old tactic of divide and conquer. It will be a big challenge for us to maintain unity because those people inside the fence are going to thank God their backsides were saved," he said.
The forced removal of 8,000 settlers from the Gaza Strip last year showed that it could be done without widespread upheaval. Silberstein said the settlers, a minority who once wielded immense political power, had lost public support. Where once they were seen as enhancing Israel's security, now they are seen as undermining it.
"The settler community, the religious Zionist community and the [ultra-religious] Haredim bear a certain responsibility for [alienating] the majority of Israelis. The rest of us took the support of other Israelis for granted. Unfortunately we woke up a little late," he said.
"If the government decides we have to go, respecting that decision is the democratic thing. The furthest I would go is passive resistance. It's illegal but it was good enough for Gandhi and Martin Luther King."
Silberstein will vote for the National Union led by Benny Elon, who wants to annex the occupied territories to Israel and expel many Palestinians to Jordan. So will Yoel Tzur, a founding resident of Beit El in 1978 whose wife and 12-year-old son were shot dead by a Palestinian 10 years ago.
"Support for Kadima shows the despair of the Jewish people, a feeling that we have no alternative. It's a bankruptcy, or a lack of willingness to keep the tradition of the Jewish people who have returned after 2,000 years," he said. "We will work in a democratic way to oppose it in any way possible but once the government makes the decision we will respect it."
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning