US President George W. Bush leaves this region having declared India and Pakistan strategic partners. But his declarations spoke just as loudly of the shifting balance of power in the region, and the world.
It was India that appeared to come out the biggest winner last week. Pakistan walked away with little more than a mild pat on the back after Bush's visit on Saturday. While buttressing the US' alliances in the region, Bush also took home a formidable political challenge to sell his nuclear deal with India to a skeptical Congress.
India could hardly be more pleased. "IND-US Civilization" screamed a front-page headline in the Times of India on Saturday, in joyous praise for what Bush had bestowed on the nation.
Those gifts included a nuclear deal celebrated by Indian officials, elevation as a global leader and nary a recriminatory word on the troubles in the disputed province of Kashmir. Indian backers of a US-India partnership were elated.
"I think we have managed to get a rather good deal," a senior Indian official said, unwilling to disclose his name because the full details of the nuclear agreement had yet to be shared with the Indian parliament. "This is from our point of view, a hard bargain."
In Pakistan, the difference was discerned.
"One thing is very clear: The US is keeping India and Pakistan at two different levels," said Hasan Askari Rizvi, an independent political analyst in Lahore. "The kind of multifaceted interaction that exists between India and the United States is not to be seen with reference to Pakistan. For Pakistan, it's a limited and cautious support."
Some US Congress members and analysts have already taken the Bush administration to task for making too many concessions to India, the bete noire of outsourcing in some US circles and a stubborn opponent of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Bush's test is to persuade Americans that India is worth the bargain.
The balance of costs and benefits has everything to do with India's new place in the world and its rise in the US imagination.
It is the world's largest democracy, seen in some quarters as a potential check on China. It has the world's second-largest Muslim population. Its engineers and call center workers are embedded in the largest US firms. Its immigrants in the US have grown swiftly in number, wealth and influence.
Perhaps most important, India's economy has galloped forward for the last several years: It is poised to post more than 8 percent growth this year and double-digit growth in the years ahead. Its potential market is vast.
Bush exhorted India to open that market further, and in his joint statement with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, he listed "economic prosperity and trade" as the first among several agreements made between the countries.
But it is the nuclear deal, which commits the US to supporting India's civilian nuclear program, that will stand as the measure of what was achieved last week.
Despite Pakistani demands for equal nuclear status with India, the White House maintained that the scandal surrounding the Pakistani nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan and his illegal nuclear peddling made no such deal possible anytime soon.
There was only a passing public reference to Kashmir -- and that too only to urge the leaders of both India and Pakistan to work it out between themselves.
What Pakistan got instead was affirmation of its standing as a vital ally in the war on terrorism and what many in India will interpret as modest blessing of President Pervez Musharraf's brand of democracy, despite Bush's nudge to conduct transparent elections next year.
Likewise, Indian officials point out that strategic ties with Washington can help India achieve its aspirations on the world stage -- chief among them, ending the country's nuclear isolation in the world and yielding the legitimacy it has long sought as a nuclear weapons state.
Mushahid Hussain, a member of the Pakistani parliament and close to Musharraf, said at least the new strategic partnership between Pakistan and the US should yield a "a peace dividend" for South Asia.
To please two lovers is by nature an impossible task, and in this instance, Bush did not leave South Asia without leaving a trail of ambivalence -- and even outright anger -- in both countries.
And while both India and Pakistan may be grateful in receiving what support Washington has to offer, it was not clear that either nation could embrace all that Bush expected of his new friends. In India, for starters, Bush's message of crusading for democracy worldwide raised eyebrows.
"As a global power, India has an historic duty to support democracy around the world," is what he told the audience at Purana Qila, a fort on Friday. He used the word "democracy" 16 times in his speech.
Ashok Mehta, a retired general who writes about foreign policy, pointed out that India was not in the habit of spreading democracy, not even in its own neighborhood.
"We would like countries to uphold democratic values, but we will not thrust that down their throats," is how Mehta put it, on his way out of the Bush address.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS