Britain should oppose lifting an EU embargo on arms sales to China if it does not receive assurances the move will not lead to an increase in weapons sales or transfer of "sensitive technologies" to Beijing, a joint parliamentary committee report said yesterday.
Lawmakers cited the threat of US punitive measures, as well as China's aggressive posturing against Taiwan, as reasons to oppose a removal of the ban.
The EU's arms embargo was slapped on China after the 1989 massacre of pro-democracy students in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, but France has led a group of EU countries arguing that it is outdated and should be lifted.
The report, issued by a group of lawmakers drawn from four separate House of Commons committees on arms sales, warned of "major EU-US trade repercussions" in the event the ban is lifted -- a reference to Washington's threats to cut European companies out of defense contracts and deny them access to US technology.
The report also mentioned the risk that "EU member states [could] enhance China's military capacity in a worrying way," and that weapons exported from Europe could be used for internal repression.
It stressed that any end to the arms embargo should not lead to a qualitative or quantitative increase in arms sales, or the transfer of "sensitive technologies" to China.
"If such assurances cannot be obtained we recommend that the government opposes lifting the arms embargo and any other change of EU policy with regard to arms sales to China."
Committee chair Roger Berry said the "very real risks involved in the lifting of the EU arms embargo on China ... must be mitigated effectively."
Britain has backed a lifting of the ban, but officials have signaled it will seek to defer the decision until later in light of increasing pressure from the US, which claims it would upset the balance of power in the region and put Taiwan at risk.
Diplomatic sources quoted by media this week have said that London and some other EU states including Sweden, Belgium and Italy were leaning toward postponement of the decision on the arms ban.
The parliamentary report comes only hours after Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott backed lifting the ban -- although his comments were later watered down by Prime Minister Tony Blair's office.
Prescott, standing in for Blair, told parliament "I think the good sense in Europe will be that they will come to some agreement on this matter and lift that embargo."
Blair's spokesman said afterwards that the government supported EU plans to lift the embargo in principle but wanted first to create a strong code that would regulate sales to China.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS