Australia's government yesterday reassured its Asian neighbors that suggestions of pre-emptive strikes against overseas extremist bases would not target its partners in the war against terror.
However, opposition leaders accused Prime Minister John Howard of sending mixed signals with the softened tone, saying his "hairy-chested" comments Monday were geared towards winning votes in the Oct. 9 general election.
Some analysts also said they appeared to be electioneering.
National security has become a top campaign issue after Australia's embassy in Jakarta was bombed earlier this month. With Howard's hawkish image, the blast had been widely expected to favor the conservative government. However, a new poll yesterday showed the opposition Labor Party had opened up an election-winning lead.
Trying to allay regional concerns after Malaysia took exception to Howard's statement Monday that he would not hesitate to launch a unilateral strike, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer specifically ruled out any such attacks on Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia or Singapore.
If needed, he said, they would target "failed states" that were unable to police themselves, citing the Solomon Islands.
"Of course we haven't any intention of sending troops into Indonesia without the approval of Indonesia," Downer told national radio. "Now in the case of Indonesia, or Malaysia or Singapore or the Philippines, these are countries which are our partners in the war against terrorism.
"But imagine a situation -- it's not likely to be Indonesia or a country which has a strong counter-terrorism capability but a failed state in the South Pacific, as the Solomons once was and is not now -- and terrorists were about to attack and the country involved either didn't want to, or in their case, couldn't do anything to stop it.
"We would have to go and do it ourselves."
Australia last year led international intervention in the Solomon Islands to restore law and order after years of militia violence.
Howard denied that he was sending mixed messages but said he did not think a pre-emptive strike would be needed.
"I don't expect any of this to arise, but I don't want any Australians to be in any doubt as to where I stand on this issue," he said. "And I think sensible people will understand it."
Security analyst John Bruni said it was clear that any attack on Indonesia, widely considered the most logical target of any pre-emptive strike by Australia, could conceivably lead to war.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS