Britain is embroiled in a fresh conflict with Iraq as it battles to quash global terrorism for ever, British Prime Minister Tony Blair declared in a stark relabeling of the situation on Sunday.
Sixteen months after US President George W. Bush declared that combat operations were over, the British prime minister used a joint press conference with his Iraqi counterpart, Ayad Allawi, to say that coalition forces were engaged in a "new conflict" now that the "first conflict" to remove former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was over. But the battleground of this fight was global terrorism versus "the side of democracy and liberty."
"Whatever the disagreements about the first conflict in Iraq to remove Saddam, in this conflict now taking place in Iraq, this is the crucible in which the future of this global terrorism will be decided.
"Either it will succeed and this terrorism will grow, or we will succeed, the Iraqi people will succeed and this global terrorism will be delivered a huge defeat," he said.
Blair's fresh presentation of the chaos engulfing parts of Iraq came as the head of the UK army, General Sir Mike Jackson, admitted that British troops were now fighting "a counterinsurgency war."
With 300 people killed last week, including three Kurdish hostages beheaded yesterday, he said: "August was a very busy month and British soldiers were involved in war fighting."
The relabeling -- described by the Foreign Office as a "new language" -- also comes a week before the Labour conference, at which Blair can expect to face his party's fury at his handling of the conflict.
A YouGov poll at the weekend suggested that support for the conflict is at its lowest. A mere 38 percent of people now believe the war was right, and 52 percent think it was wrong, compared with 66 percent who supported the war, and 29 percent who opposed it, when US troops entered Baghdad on April 10 last year. Women in particular appear to have withdrawn their support, with only 30 percent thinking troops should remain, compared with 47 percent of men.
Blair adopted a conciliatory tone, insisting he did not want to prevent debate over "the wisdom of removing Saddam" and acknowledging the conflict had been "deeply divisive."
But he insisted every "sensible and decent person" should move on and recognize that the terrorists and insurgents were opposed to "every single one of the values we in countries like this hold dear."
"Now is not the time for the international community to divide or disagree but to come together ... and realize that the struggle of the prime minister and the Iraqi people, for liberty and democracy and stability, is actually our struggle too."
He rejected suggestions that the coalition and Iraqi forces were already losing the war against terror, but -- acknowledging there was "a real fight going on" -- indicated the scale of their difficulty.
"If we succeed in Iraq that's a huge blow to this form of terrorism. If we don't, then of course it's very serious.
"We are fighting and we will succeed because our determination and belief in our values is greater than the terrorists', and we are going to win."
Speaking at the Downing Street press conference, Allawi appeared more defiant than Blair in predicting "success against the forces of evil." He called for greater UN involvement, but insisted the January elections would go ahead, despite the continuing carnage.
"We are adamant democracy is going to prevail in Iraq," he said.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS