European leaders, reaching across the fault lines of last century's battlefields, said on Friday that they had struck a deal on a European constitution, the latest step in the gradual but creaking process toward a more united continent.
Under the agreement, for the first time, the continent -- through the 25-nation EU -- would have a president, a foreign minister and a single rule book to replace the web of treaties that govern the complex relationships among the union's member countries. But the constitution still faces a hard test: ratification by all 25 members, which could be exceedingly difficult in the face of strong skepticism in some countries and voter apathy. At least seven of the nations have decided to ratify the pact by referendum.
PHOTO: AP
While the leaders toasted their success with champagne, the past two days were marked by dogged and at times polarized talks that ended in compromises many participants strongly criticized. Many of the compromises limited the scope of decision-making in sensitive areas such as taxation and social issues. Negotiators inserted what they called "emergency brakes" for countries worried about retaining their national prerogatives, notably Britain.
"We have to move at the pace of the slowest camel in the train," said John Palmer, director of the European Policy Center in Brussels.
The constitution is a legalistic document of nearly 350 articles -- perhaps not what leaders had envisioned when they called for a "more democratic, more transparent and more efficient" system at a meeting two-and-a-half years ago in Brussels.
But it contains a string of innovations. Among them is creation of a European public prosecutor, a sort of nascent federal attorney-general who would be responsible for investigating and bringing to trial those cases where the EU's financial interests are at stake. According to officials, they could involve crimes like fraud in the EU budget or counterfeiting of euro notes and coins. Ultimately the prosecutor could also be responsible for prosecuting "serious crime having a cross-border dimension."
There are also provisions for countries to take part in special combat units if they choose, an issue closely watched by Washington; and for closer cooperation on military procurement.
"This is definitely a step forward," said Marco Incerti, research fellow at the Center for European Policy Studies. "They have increased transparency and simplified the institutions to some extent."
With its demands to keep a national veto on a wide range of issues including taxation and foreign policy, Britain was pitted against France and Germany, whose delegations were grinding their teeth at what they saw as their neighbor's intransigence.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
DEFENSE UPHEAVAL: Trump was also to remove the first woman to lead a military service, as well as the judge advocates general for the army, navy and air force US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General C.Q. Brown, and pushed out five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of US military leadership. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that he would nominate former lieutenant general Dan “Razin” Caine to succeed Brown, breaking with tradition by pulling someone out of retirement for the first time to become the top military officer. The president would also replace the head of the US Navy, a position held by Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead a military service,
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
RSS