Brazilian opposition leaders, press associations and legal and judicial groups on Wednesday protested their government's decision to expel a New York Times correspondent for a report critical of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, but da Silva said he would not consider revoking the action.
Speaking in Brasilia at a breakfast of political party heads allied to his government, da Silva said he would oppose any appeal of the order. "This journalist will not stay in the country," he said. "He will be legally forbidden to enter."
The article, written by Larry Rohter, the Rio de Janeiro bureau chief for The Times, and published on Sunday, reported publicly expressed concerns about da Silva's drinking habits. It said, "Some of his countrymen have begun wondering if their president's predilection for strong drink is affecting his performance in office."
Brazil's Justice Ministry said that Rohter's banning was justified because the article was "lightweight, lying and offensive to the honor of the president."
Da Silva said that the article represented "a malicious assault on the institution of the presidency."
Roberto Busato, president of Brazil's national bar association, protested that da Silva was resorting to a repressive law that had last been used during the 1964 to 1985 military dictatorship. Da Silva's left-leaning government contains many ministers who fought the nation's military rulers. Da Silva himself, then an outspoken labor leader, was imprisoned.
In an open letter to the government, the Foreign Correspondents Association of Sao Paulo said, "We do not understand how a democratic government that had many of its leaders persecuted and censured can take such an authoritarian decision, especially since it was the foreign press during the years of military regime that was responsible for attracting international attention to denunciations of the dictatorship."
Fernando Henrique Cardoso, da Silva's predecessor as president, said at a breakfast meeting of foreign correspondents in Sao Paulo on Wednesday that while he found the New York Times article superficial and frivolous, he was surprised and disappointed by the reaction to it.
"There are frivolous stories published every day," he said. "The expulsion is an overreaction; it goes against democratic principles."
The Forca Sindical, the country's second-largest labor union, which on Monday had urged the government to declare Rohter "persona non grata," issued a statement Wednesday condemning the government's effort to throw him out.
"The action taken by the government worries us because it is a reaction typical of authoritarian governments that don't like contrary voices," the union's president, Paulo Pereira da Silva, said.
The New York Times said it would oppose the move to expel Rohter.
"Based on consultations with Brazilian legal counsel, we believe there is no basis for revocation of Rohter's visa and would take appropriate action to defend his rights," said Catherine Mathis, a spokeswoman for the newspaper.
Bill Keller, the executive editor, said on Tuesday that if Brazil "intends to expel a journalist for writing an article that offended the president, that would raise serious questions about Brazil's professed commitment to freedom of expression and a free press."
"No one can call this an attack on the freedom of the press," Amorim told a Senate committee in Brasilia. But Paulo Sotero, the Wasington correspondent of the Estado de Sao Paulo, disagreed and said that Brazilian journalists were consequently uniting behind Rohter.
"We fought too hard for freedom of the press in this country to allow this kind of nonsense," he said in a telephone interview.
"If the government was worried that Larry Rohter was having a bad affect on the image of the country," he said, "this is much more of a disaster in that sense."
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
RSS