In a cramped laboratory, a biologist with the Institute of Cetacean Research prepares plugs taken from whales' ears for age analysis. Scientists study their reproductive habits, food sources and the mercury levels in their tissue.
And then, of course, there's the guy who studies the best way to kill them.
For nearly two decades, as commercial whaling has largely vanished under a global ban, a half-dozen Japanese vessels have sailed off to the waters of Antarctica and the northwestern Pacific each year to hunt, kill and bring home samples of whales for an ongoing research program -- along with tonnes of meat for sale.
Possibly no other Japanese government-backed activity has so isolated Tokyo from its allies in the US and Europe, or so enraged environmental groups.
But at this institute, which serves as the heart of the operation, officials bristle at the suggestion they are doing anything wrong. Instead, they argue that they are fighting the good fight, and that the whaling ban is akin to Hindus forcing the world to stop eating beef, or Muslims banning pork.
Government negotiators are even more strident.
"Why should we back down?" said Shuya Nakatsuka, a Fisheries Agency official in charge of Japan's international whaling agreements. "It is those who oppose whaling who should change."
Tokyo's push for a resumption of commercial whaling will likely put it in the hot seat once again when the International Whaling Commission (IWC) holds its annual convention in Italy next month. Last year's meeting ended with a resolution for Japan to halt its research program. That generated angry calls in Tokyo for the country to retaliate by quitting the group, or at least withhold funding.
"We are still considering our options," Nakatsuka said. "We will have to see how the meeting goes."
The research fleet, meanwhile, is readying its harpoons.
The Nisshin Maru mothership, accompanied by a trawler and sighting-sampling vessels, will set off this Thursday on its annual summer hunt in the northwestern Pacific to kill 100 minke whales, 50 Bryde's whales, 50 sei whales and 10 sperm whales. Another 50 minke whales will be hunted along Japan's shores.
Earlier this year, the fleet returned from the Antarctic, where it killed about 400 minke whales.
The primary goals of the research are to determine how many whales are out there, how long they live, how fast they breed, what they eat and ultimately how many could be killed commercially without significantly depleting their stocks.
Hiroshi Hatanaka, who heads the program, said that whenever possible, data is taken with non-lethal methods, such as simple observation or firing arrows from crossbow-like devices to pull out plugs of skin for DNA sampling.
But he said that isn't enough. The research requires the killing of whales, and not just a few here and there -- hundreds must be taken to get a statistically meaningful sample.
"We study their eating habits by examining the content of their stomachs," Hatanaka said. "Determining their age requires acquiring the tissue in their ears. You can't get this data by merely watching a live whale."
Greenpeace and several other environmental groups claim that is a smoke-screen.
"Though there may be some kinds of research that require killing, the Japanese researchers use this as an excuse to get what they really want, which is the whale meat," said Junko Sakurai, Greenpeace Japan's whaling expert. "It's just commercial whaling in disguise."
Hatanaka acknowledged that about 2,720 tonnes of whale meat were sold last year, bringing in US$52 million. But he said the money was used to fund the program in keeping with IWC rules, which require byproducts of the research not to be wasted.
Opposition notwithstanding, Japan has compiled a formidable case.
In 1992, the IWC's own scientific committee acknowledged that, with about 760,000 minke whales in the Antarctic, an annual take of 2,000 could continue for the next 100 years without hurting overall stocks.
But Dan Goodman, a Canadian who serves as a spokesman for the research institute, complained the scientific side of the argument has been ignored.
"Australia is the best example," he said.
"They kill 6 million kangaroos every year, but they're opposed to the killing of even one whale. It's a political freebie. It's a `your-problem-not-mine.' There's no constituency in Australia for whaling," he said.
Goodman also noted Japan has been singled out more than Norway, which resumed commercial whaling despite the IWC ban.
"Norway is seen as having a good record on the environment," he said.
"The perception of Japan in a broad array of environmental issues is very negative -- `They cut down every tree to make disposable chopsticks, they use way too much energy.' Japan has a public image problem," he said.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
RSS