British Prime Minister Tony Blair has gambled his career by deciding to hold a referendum on the proposed EU constitution, newspapers agreed yesterday.
The move, announced by Blair in parliament on Tuesday, was attacked by much of the press as a bid to gain political advantage domestically rather than being motivated by a commitment to democracy.
"Blair gambles his career on Europe verdict," said the Times on its front page.
The right-wing paper said Blair had made the "most complete U-turn of his premiership" and left "serious questions over whether he could survive a defeat" in a referendum, the date of which has not been revealed.
The Financial Times accused Blair of "grubby opportunism." It said he had been compelled to "cast aside his principled objections to a referendum for political expediency" in a move likely to help him in the next general election, expected in the first half of next year.
The right-wing Daily Express believed that Blair was doing the right thing but for the wrong reason.
"Mr Blair is not canvassing our opinion. He is simply robbing his critics of a stick with which to beat him," the paper said in an editorial.
The left-wing Daily Mirror said that Blair had "cleverly neutralized" what Britain's main opposition Conservatives hoped to make the major issue of the next general election, and so given his ruling Labour party a huge boost.
A referendum had long been sought by Britain's numerous eurosceptics, including the Conservatives, while Blair had come in for increasing criticism over his previous insistence that a plebiscite was not needed.
The Daily Mirror concluded that Blair "cannot survive losing this referendum -- too much is at stake."
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw rejected such talk in an interview on BBC television late on Tuesday.
"Of course he wouldn't," he said, when asked if Blair would step down if he lost.
"In referendums which have been held in other countries, Sweden and Denmark for example, or Ireland, when the referendum decision has gone against the head of government it has not led to resignations. Why should it?" Straw said.
"Blair stakes his future on Britain's place in EU" was the front page headline in the right-wing Daily Telegraph, which said Blair had "executed the biggest and most humiliating about-turn of his career."
Defeat in the ballot "would undermine the central thrust of Labour policy and call his future into question," the paper said, adding that while Blair had taken "a calculated risk," it was also "a demonstration of his political survival instinct."
"Frustrated on other fronts -- Iraq, immigration, public services -- and with [finance minister] Gordon Brown impatient to succeed him, Mr Blair has decided to change the subject: to Europe," the paper said in an editorial comment.
The left-wing Guardian said it was in Britain's interests to sign the draft constitution and Blair had made a "good start to a long campaign."
It added, however, that Blair had "issued his call to arms as a tactical ploy rather than as a clarion call."
The Sun, right-wing and fiercely eurosceptic, reported that 34,559 of its readers had rung in to voice their opposition to "handing more power to Brussels," while just 939 had said they were in favor of the constitution -- which EU leaders aim to approve in principle in June.
The tabloid, Britain's biggest selling daily, called for a referendum to be held as soon as possible.
The paper's political editor, Trevor Kavanagh, said Blair had "enraged allies in France and Germany by putting the whole EU edifice at risk by putting the constitution to a vote he cannot win."
The constitution must be ratified by all EU states to come into effect.
Reports have suggested that media baron Rupert Murdoch -- who owns the Sun and the Times -- has made it clear he could not support the re-election of a Labour government unless it offered a referendum.
The backing of the Sun was seen by many as crucial in helping Blair come to power in 1997.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
RSS