Orphans and babies as young as three months old have been used as guinea pigs in potentially dangerous medical experiments sponsored by a giant pharmaceutical company.
British giant GlaxoSmithKline is embroiled in the scandal.
The firm sponsored experiments on the children from Incarnation Children's Center, a New York care home that specializes in treating HIV sufferers and is run by Catholic charities.
The children had either been infected with HIV or born to HIV-positive mothers.
Their parents were dead, untraceable or deemed unfit to look after them.
According to documents, Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation.
The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal that the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the "safety and tolerance" of AIDS medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects.
Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT.
Normally, trials on children would require parental consent but, as the infants are in care, New York's authorities hold that role.
The city health department has launched an investigation into claims that more than 100 children at Incarnation were used in 36 experiments -- at least four of them co-sponsored by Glaxo.
Some of these trials were designed to test the "toxicity" of AIDS medications.
One involved giving children as young as 4 years old a high-dosage cocktail of seven drugs at one time.
Another looked at the reaction in six-month-old babies to a double dose of measles vaccine.
Most experiments were funded by federal agencies like the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Until now Glaxo's role had not emerged.
In 1997 an experiment co-sponsored by Glaxo used children from Incarnation to "obtain tolerance, safety and pharmacokinetic" data for herpes drugs.
In a more recent experiment, the children were used to test the drug AZT.
A third experiment sponsored by Glaxo and US drug firm Pfizer investigated the "long-term safety" of anti-bacterial drugs on three-month-old babies.
The medical establishment has defended the trials, arguing they enabled these children to obtain state-of-the-art therapy that they would otherwise not have received for illnesses that could potentially be fatal.
However, health campaigners argue there is a difference between providing the latest drugs and experimentation.
They claim many of the experiments were "phase 1 trials" -- among the most risky.
They also claim that HIV tests for babies are not a reliable indicator of actual infection and therefore toxic drugs could have been given to healthy infants. HIV drugs are similar to those used in chemotherapy and can have serious side effects.
Vera Sharav, president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, said the children had been treated like "laboratory animals."
"These are some of the most vulnerable individuals in the country and there appears to be a policy of giving drug firms access to them," she said.
"Throughout the history of medical research we have seen prisoners abused, the mentally ill abused and now poor kids in a care home," she said.
Sharav has urged the US Food and Drug Administration to investigate and has demanded complete disclosure of all adverse effects suffered by the children, including deaths.
Glaxo has confirmed it provided funds for some of the experiments but denied any improper action.
A spokeswoman said, "These studies were implemented by the US AIDS Clinical Trial Group, a clinical research network paid for by the National Institutes of Health.
"Glaxo's involvement in such studies would have been to provide study drugs or funding but we would have no interactions with the patients.
"Generally speaking, clinical research is carefully regulated in the US and it would be the responsibility of the appropriate authorities to ensure all subjects in a clinical trial provided appropriate, informed consent to conform with all local laws and regulations regarding legal authority in the case of minors."
The Incarnation trials were run by Columbia University Medical Center doctors.
Columbia spokeswoman Annie Bayne said there had been no clinical trials at Incarnation since 2000 and that consent for the children was provided by the Administration for Children's Services, which relies on a panel of doctors and lawyers to determine whether the benefits of a trial for each child outweighs the risks to the child.
"There are many safeguards in the system. HIV is eventually a fatal disease, but drug therapy has lengthened life significantly," Bayne said.
A spokesman for Incarnation said regarding the scandal, "The purpose of the trials was to test the efficacy of HIV medication."
"These trials were based on scientific evidence of their potential value in the treatment of HIV- infected children," the spokesman said.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS