US Secretary of State Colin Powell on Tuesday revealed the first cracks of doubt from within the Bush administration about the decision to go to war against Iraq, acknowledging he might not have supported an invasion had he known former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction.
Powell's admission that the "absence of a stockpile changes the political calculus" was the first public sign that the Bush administration may be having second thoughts on its decision to wage war.
However, the comments, made to the Washington Post yesterday, seem to be a momentary lapse from Powell's enduring belief that it was right to go to war.
He maintained that Saddam had continued to pose a danger to the world -- even without an active arsenal.
He tried to minimize the political fallout from his comments by telling reporters yesterday: "There should be no doubt ... that we have done the right thing and history certainly will be the test of that."
But Powell's protestations are unlikely to distract attention from a most astonishing admission, especially during an election year.
As secretary of state, it was Powell's role to convince the international community to support US President George W. Bush's decision to go to war.
Nearly a year ago he made a forceful presentation to the UN, using satellite maps and radio intercepts, to argue that Iraq had an active weapons program. It was based on "facts and conclusions based on solid evidence," he said then.
That certainty has vanished following last week's testimony by the chief US weapons inspector, David Kay. He told Congress that America's prewar intelligence was simply wrong and Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction.
Asked whether he would have helped build the case for war had he known at the time, Powell told the Washington Post: "I don't know, because it was the stockpile that presented the final little piece that made it more of a real and present danger and threat to the region and to the world."
He went on: "The absence of a stockpile changes the political calculus. It changes the answer you get."
The comments were a deviation from the Bush administration's response to the news that Saddam was no longer a nuclear, biological or chemical weapons power at the time of the war.
Although officials have been retreating from the prewar certainties for months, the White House has avoided direct comment on Kay's report.
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
CONFIDENT ON DEAL: ‘Ukraine wants a seat at the table, but wouldn’t the people of Ukraine have a say? It’s been a long time since an election, the US president said US President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and added that he was more confident of a deal to end the war after US-Russia talks. Trump increased pressure on Zelenskiy to hold elections and chided him for complaining about being frozen out of talks in Saudi Arabia. The US president also suggested that he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin before the end of the month as Washington overhauls its stance toward Russia. “I’m very disappointed, I hear that they’re upset about not having a seat,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when asked about the Ukrainian
RSS