Australia is discussing buying US missiles, including some capable of shooting down hostile missiles in space as part of a high-tech defense shield which the government yesterday acknowledged could fuel a regional arms race.
As part of its 15.8 billion Australian dollars (US$10.3 billion) defense budget, the federal government intends to buy three air warfare destroyers for the navy. Defense Minister Robert Hill said they may be armed with the missiles.
US defense officials were in Australia yesterday negotiating a memorandum of understanding on Australia's involvement in the US missile defense shield dubbed "Son of Star Wars."
"It's got the capability to basically meet and intercept missiles outside of the atmosphere, long-range three stage missiles that can do what the Americans did, destroy an incoming missile 137km above the earth traveling at 3.7km a second," Hill told Australian Broadcasting Corp radio yesterday.
He was referring to a successful missile interception test the US military conducted last month in the Pacific from an AEGIS cruiser.
The current US missile defense plans are less ambitious than US President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative of 1983. He envisioned an impenetrable shield against the Soviet Union's arsenal of thousands of missiles. That effort, derided as "Star Wars" by its critics, was later dropped.
Washington hopes that developing a shield against ballistic missiles will protect it against potential threats from countries like North Korea. It wants allies such as Britain, Canada and Australia involved in the project, particularly for the use of satellite tracking stations in their countries.
Asked if Australia's moves could escalate an Asian arms race, Hill said: "There is an argument that that would encourage others to develop their attack missiles further or to proliferate them. But the proliferation is already there."
Hill's comments came just days before General Richard Myers, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, was due to visit Australia.
Myers spent Monday in Japan, another nation that has approved spending billions buying US missiles to bolster its defenses.
Australia has in the past angered some Asian neighbors with its close strategic links to the US and Washington's defense policies.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard sent shock waves through the region last year when he suggested he might launch pre-emptive strikes at terror camps in the region if they were perceived to be a threat to Australia.
Not long after, US President George W. Bush's called Australia its sheriff in the region, a suggestion that riled then-Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad who frequently clashed with Howard during his tenure.
"I can assure Australia that if it acts as a sheriff in this country he will be treated as a terrorist and dealt with as a terrorist," Mahathir said last October.
In Jakarta, an opposition lawmaker in the Indonesian parliament insisted yesterday that Indonesia was a clear target of any proposed missile defense system Australia would adopt.
"We are really concerned with this military build-up, it's not defensive anymore, it's offensive already," lawmaker Djoko Susilo said.
Canberra had already decided it would also buy air-to-surface attack cruise missiles which would be launched from fighter jets and surveillance planes.
"We're planning to equip our FA-18s and the P3 Orions with what you would call a cruise missile," Hill said.
Ron Huisken, an expert in US defense policy, said the government needed to justify such systems were necessary.
"It's a complicated business. It makes a big difference whether you aspire to defend Australia itself or whether you aspire to defend Australian expeditionary forces going overseas, there's a lot of holes in the story so far before we spend lots of money," said Huisken, who is based a the Australian National University.
Hill announced last year plans by the government to spend A$15.8 billion (US$10.3 billion) on defense, or 1.9 percent of the nation's economic output, for the fiscal year.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
RSS