British Prime Minister Tony Blair was forced onto the defensive on Wednesday when he admitted that he would have to resign as prime minister if he lied to the British parliament over his role in the naming of the UK government scientist and weapons inspector, David Kelly, in the row over a UK government dossier on Iraq.
As Lord Hutton warned Britain's political classes against jumping to conclusions ahead of the publication of his report into the circumstances leading up to the death of Kelly, the British prime minister said he "of course" accepted that ministers who mislead members of parliament have to quit.
Blair's remarks came after the UK Opposition leader, Michael Howard, all but accused the prime minister of lying days after the death of Kelly. In their first House of Commons clash of the new year Howard asked Blair whether he stood by his statement of July 22, made on board a flight from Shanghai to Hong Kong, that he had "emphatically" not leaked the name of Kelly.
Howard believes the prime minister's declaration may be highly damaging after Sir Kevin Tebbit, the permanent secretary at the UK Ministry of Defence, told the Hutton inquiry in October that Blair chaired the key meetings during the "naming strategy" -- the convoluted process which led to the confirmation of the scientist's name. "Either the permanent secretary or the prime minister is not telling the truth," Howard said.
His hopes of coaxing the prime minister to repeat his inflight remarks in the Commons -- potentially endangering Blair's position if Lord Hutton rules against him -- were thwarted when the prime minister gave a careful reply: "I stand by the totality of what I said at that time -- but in relation to this issue and all the other issues, the Hutton inquiry is going to report shortly. I suggest you wait for that."
This gave the prime minister the confidence to tell another Opposition MP that he would resign if he was proved to have lied to the Commons.
The angry exchanges came hours before Lord Hutton signalled his determination to avoid being used as a political football by quashing speculation about a government decision to make a late submission to his inquiry, the issue that prompted the new row.
"There was nothing surprising or unexpected or of special significance in the making of these written submissions," Lord Hutton said.
Lord Hutton attempted to calm the atmosphere by saying that all the main players -- the government, the BBC and the Kelly family -- had accepted an invitation from the inquiry to submit further evidence, he said. "Contrary to the suggestions in some of the press reports today, there was nothing surprising or unexpected or of special significance in the making of these written submissions," Lord Hutton said.
His intervention came as a relief to Blair's office in Downing Street, London, which had been struggling to dampen speculation about its decision to submit evidence after Lord Hutton concluded his hearings.
But Lord Hutton, who is due to retire next week before he publishes his report, underlined his independence when he made clear that the evidence was being withheld at the request of the government.
His remarks may prove embarrassing for Downing Street, which had given the impression that it was opposed to publication of the documents out of respect to Lord Hutton. Inquiry sources were keen to point out that the law lord wanted to publish the documents but only changed his mind after representations from the government. Lord Hutton's statement also leaves it unclear whether No 10's final written submission refers to Sir Kevin's evidence.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
Cook Islands officials yesterday said they had discussed seabed minerals research with China as the small Pacific island mulls deep-sea mining of its waters. The self-governing country of 17,000 people — a former colony of close partner New Zealand — has licensed three companies to explore the seabed for nodules rich in metals such as nickel and cobalt, which are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Despite issuing the five-year exploration licenses in 2022, the Cook Islands government said it would not decide whether to harvest the potato-sized nodules until it has assessed environmental and other impacts. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and
RSS