Avraham Burg, former speaker of the Israeli parliament, has been stirring up trouble. In August, he charged Israel with having failed in its historic mission to be a "light unto nations" through its belligerence. He was promptly accused of encouraging "the Jew hatred sweeping all of Europe."
A few weeks ago, Burg was at it again, articulating the nightmare all Israelis fear: "Between the Jordan [River] and the Mediterranean, somewhere between next year and two years' time, there will be born the first Palestinian ... of the Palestinian majority," -- the generation of Arabs who will outnumber Israelis.
Now figures released last week show that immigration -- to a country beset by violence and a faltering economy -- has collapsed to its lowest level in 15 years, dramatically cutting the population growth.
The figures show the Achilles heel of the security policies of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his Likud-led government. In three years, immigration has fallen by 50 percent, a stark contrast to Sharon's avowed aim to attract a million immigrants in the next decade.
According to Israel's state statistics office, the population is now 6.75 million -- 81 percent Jewish and "other nationalities" and 19 percent Arab.
Crucially, however, the figures show that despite financial incentives for couples who have more children, the population rose last year by 116,000, or 1.7 percent -- its lowest increase since 1990.
In the 1990s, annual immigration ranged from 70,000 to 200,000 as around a million Jews from the former Soviet Union -- many of them more loosely defined as Jewish than some religious authorities would prefer -- flocked to Israel.
At the heart of all this is simple mathematics. Forecasts from the US Population Reference Bureau show Israel's population doubling in 45 years, that of the West Bank in 21 years and that of Gaza in 15 years. In other words, Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, and Israeli Arabs will outnumber the Jewish population by 2020.
This has led commentators such as David Landau, editor of the English-language edition of the newspaper Ha'aretz, to warn of a "cataclysmic" demographic challenge.
Landau told a symposium in San Francisco that he feared Palestinians would abandon calls for a two-state solution and insist on equal voting rights within a wider Israel -- which would end the Zionist dream.
The growing sense of panic among Israelis over the demographic time bomb underscores the bitter divisions that are emerging in Israeli society.
Of all the cases for the future of Israel and the occupied territories, the argument of the hardliners that Jews should govern the entire "historic" land of Israel is the one that would bring the moment of crisis closest. An alternative would be a policy of expulsion or transfer of population that even many hardliners who advocate it realize would make Israel an international pariah.
This same logic would undermine any attempt to remain in the occupied territories. For without expulsion Israel is faced with the choice of delivering political rights to the burgeoning population or practicing a form of political apartheid.
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
‘UNUSUAL EVENT’: The Australian defense minister said that the Chinese navy task group was entitled to be where it was, but Australia would be watching it closely The Australian and New Zealand militaries were monitoring three Chinese warships moving unusually far south along Australia’s east coast on an unknown mission, officials said yesterday. The Australian government a week ago said that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea, and were approaching northeast Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles yesterday said that the Chinese ships — the Hengyang naval frigate, the Zunyi cruiser and the Weishanhu replenishment vessel — were “off the east coast of Australia.” Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and