Liberty Times (LT): As you were new to politics when [People First Party (PFP) Chairman and presidential candidate] James Soong (宋楚瑜) asked you to be his running mate, what motivated you to enter the world of politics?
Sandra Yu (余湘): I joined the PFP in 2000, but used to think I was far removed from politics.
Chairman Soong came to speak with me many times last year, and I was unable to persuade him not to choose me as his running mate.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
I am a Christian, and I felt that Chairman Soong came across as a very sincere political worker when he spoke about his political views and ideas on running the nation.
I want to spread the Gospel and help people handle matters, and I regret that I was not able to give Soong a chance the last three times he ran. If he had been elected in 2000, Taiwan would be a totally different place.
It was very late when Soong decided to run. It is like he said during his platform speech — he is not the captain, but he still does not want the ship to sink, so he made the decision to run.
LT: A month into campaigning, how do you feel about things?
Yu: In the past, I was a boss, a CEO, I was very aggressive — if I said something, it had to be done. If one makes no contributions, then there were no contributions, one should not talk about hard work.
My reactions in the past were swift and decisive, but now as a running mate I walk in Soong’s footsteps. I cannot act as I did in the past, doing what I want. I must know when to speak, and when to say less. Seeing the world from the back, things look quite different.
LT: Looking back, would you still make the decision to enter politics if you could decide again?
Yu: The most charming thing about life is that you have no way to know things in advance, and the most wonderful thing about it is that there is no way to turn back the clock. At this time, whether this is intuition speaking or rationale, I would still choose this path.
I do not see it as a career in politics, I see it as the course of life. I often say to young people, if I came to a fork in the road I would choose the path less traveled, so that I might see different things from what others see.
LT: As a member of the PFP, what can you do to break Taiwanese politics free from the dichotomy between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)?
Yu: A more advanced society should be one with many political parties. Taiwan, the UK and the US are all politically bipartisan nations. After the election of US President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was ridiculed as a second “Trump.”
Conversely, Germany is a multi-party state, and is run very well — its government discusses environmental protection and ways to assist different groups of people.
Taiwanese parties only think about election victories, and use whatever ill-conceived method they can think of to achieve this, even going after their own members.
I urge the public to vote for the PFP, because the KMT and the DPP are extremely detached; under either of them the nation will not have a future. Whenever the issue of unification with China or independence is raised, no law regardless of how good it is will get passed. The situation is bad for Taiwan.
I emphasize that Taiwan needs a plethora of parties, two is not enough. The DPP should not hold too much power, the KMT should not hold too much power and neither should have a legislative majority.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) once said that full administrative power means full responsibility. Many policies that should have been pushed when he was in power did not get pushed.
Now President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has full administrative power, but is not fully responsible with that power — she pushes many controversial bills.
LT: What are your views on Tsai, who is seeking re-election, and Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the KMT’s presidential candidate?
Yu: I admire Tsai for assuming the position of DPP chairperson at the hardest time for the party.
I equally admire Han, too. Six months prior to Han’s election as Kaohsiung mayor [on Nov. 24, 2018], I was in the city and asked taxi drivers if they would vote for him and all said that would be impossible. However, the climate had changed by the time I visited the city again, about one month before that election.
The DPP had long had great influence over the city, but Han used his charisma to change that.
LT: What are your views on Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲)?
Yu: Ko is a newcomer to politics and has high emotional intelligence. He has only been a politician for five or six years, and his remarks are always precise. Some people say he is cunning when answering reporters’ questions, but I think he is honest and blunt, allowing him to always get to the point.
LT: What are your views on Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘)?
Yu: I would just say he is patriotic. As a successful business leader, he could have avoided the trouble of wading into politics. He is a man with independent thinking. He has international connections, he can attend US President Donald Trump’s private parties, and it is also not that difficult for him to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
However, I do not fully understand his way of thinking. He must have different concerns in a high position like that.
LT: What are your views on the cross-strait relationship during Tsai’s term?
Yu: Many women have the experience of trying to lose weight, and it is necessary to do things to maintain that weight. Maintaining the “status quo” requires effort, too. It takes more than verbal promises.
As Tsai’s administration blames China for diplomatic and economic oppression again and again, I do not think that it has succeeded in maintaining the “status quo.”
The two sides should communicate more and know each other’s bottom lines, to avoid crossing them. There is still a lot of room for negotiations within a mutually acceptable scope.
Doing businesses with China does not necessarily need to come at the expense of Taiwan’s sovereignty.
LT: If you [and Soong] lose the election, what are your plans?
Yu: God would not let me take this journey for nothing. If, unfortunately, I am not elected, every bit of this experience will still count for something.
If elected, I could gain a lot of momentum when I promote policies. I have been a volunteer my entire life, doing service work for several non-governmental organizations. So with more power, I could be an even greater benefit to society, as if “10,000,000 Sandra Yus are working” at a time.
Interviewed by Lin Liang-sheng, Chen Yun and Chiu Yen-ling
Translated by staff writers William Hetherington and Dennis Xie
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
Taiwan’s passport ranked 34th in the world, with access to 141 visa-free destinations, according to the latest update to the Henley Passport Index released today. The index put together by Henley & Partners ranks 199 passports globally based on the number of destinations holders can access without a visa out of 227, and is updated monthly. The 141 visa-free destinations for Taiwanese passport holders are a slight decrease from last year, when holders had access to 145 destinations. Botswana and Columbia are among the countries that have recently ended visa-free status for Taiwanese after “bowing to pressure from the Chinese government,” the Ministry
‘SIGN OF DANGER’: Beijing has never directly named Taiwanese leaders before, so China is saying that its actions are aimed at the DPP, a foundation official said National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) yesterday accused Beijing of spreading propaganda, saying that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had singled out President William Lai (賴清德) in his meeting with US President Joe Biden when talking about those whose “true nature” seek Taiwanese independence. The Biden-Xi meeting took place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Saturday. “If the US cares about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in seeking Taiwanese independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra
HEALTHCARE: Following a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, Taiwanese traveling overseas for six months would no longer be able to suspend their insurance Measures allowing people to suspend National Health Insurance (NHI) services if they plan to leave the country for six months would be abolished starting Dec. 23, NHIA Director-General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) said yesterday. The decision followed the Constitutional Court’s ruling in 2022 that the regulation was unconstitutional and that it would invalidate the regulation automatically unless the NHIA amended it to conform with the Constitution. The agency would amend the regulations to remove the articles and sections that allow the suspension of NHI services, and also introduce provisional clauses for those who suspended their NHI services before Dec. 23, Shih said. According to
RSS