The slew of incidents involving Chinese students vandalizing pro-Hong Kong democracy “Lennon walls” on campuses in Taiwan and threatening Hong Kong students are a manifestations of a collective anxiety, National Tsing Hua University professor Cheng Chih-peng (鄭志鵬) said yesterday.
Since Taiwan allowed Chinese students to study in Taiwan in 2011, they have never made such an aggressive political statement, not even during the Sunflower movement and Hong Kong’s “Umbrella movement,” Cheng said.
He cited three possible causes of anxiety among Chinese students in Taiwan.
Photo: Liu Wan-chun, Taipei Times
First, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has been pushing the so-called “Chinese dream” since his rise to power, elevating Chinese ethnocentrism, he said.
With China’s rapidly growing economic power, ethnocentrism has prompted Chinese to seek recognition from the international community, he said.
However, some Chinese students studying abroad feel anxious, because many countries are not so friendly toward China, he said, adding that incidents of Chinese students seeking to impose their views on others have not only occurred in Taiwan, but also in Western countries.
Second, the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong has showen many Taiwanese that Beijing reneged on the promise that it would maintain a “one country, two systems” policy there, which has increased Taiwanese’s distrust of the Chinese government, making unification with Taiwan even more unlikely, he said.
Third, Taiwanese students have become increasingly aware of the “Chinese factor” and more vigilant of China’s tactics to influence Taiwanese society, which is a source of contention between Taiwanese and Chinese students, especially during discussions of public affairs, Cheng said.
Regarding speculation that alleged vandalism of Lennon walls by Chinese students had been orchestrated, Cheng said that people should not view Chinese students as a group that cannot be reasoned with, but should try to understand what has made them anxious.
Cheng said he could not approve of the Ministry of Education leaving incidents of vandalism in the hands of universities.
The ministry should set a standard for dealing with such incidents to prevent inadequate policies being set by institutions, he said.
Cheng said he could not agree with Immigration Agency Director-General Chiu Feng-kuang’s (邱豐光) statement that if Chinese sabotage Lennon walls, they could be barred from re-entering the nation.
It is generally accepted that students should be given a second chance if they have made a mistake at university, so the authorities should not have a “double standard” on this matter, he said.
Puma Shen (沈伯洋), an associate professor in National Taipei University’s Graduate School of Criminology, said that similar incidents have occurred in other countries, so Taiwan needs to introduce a model to handle conflicts on campus to better manage risks.
The authorities should provide counseling to Chinese studying in the nation and help them form an understanding of the predominant public opinion to help them interact with classmates, Shen said.
Students from both sides should keep in mind that the point is to exchange ideas, which should be based on democratic values, he said.
If Taiwan cannot abide by democratic institutions, it would defeat the purpose of allowing in Chinese exchange students, he said.
Academic exchanges are a way for Taiwanese to win the approval of young Chinese, so the vandalism of the Lennon walls should not be treated in a manner that would only escalate hostility, he said.
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
Taiwan’s passport ranked 34th in the world, with access to 141 visa-free destinations, according to the latest update to the Henley Passport Index released today. The index put together by Henley & Partners ranks 199 passports globally based on the number of destinations holders can access without a visa out of 227, and is updated monthly. The 141 visa-free destinations for Taiwanese passport holders are a slight decrease from last year, when holders had access to 145 destinations. Botswana and Columbia are among the countries that have recently ended visa-free status for Taiwanese after “bowing to pressure from the Chinese government,” the Ministry
‘SIGN OF DANGER’: Beijing has never directly named Taiwanese leaders before, so China is saying that its actions are aimed at the DPP, a foundation official said National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) yesterday accused Beijing of spreading propaganda, saying that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had singled out President William Lai (賴清德) in his meeting with US President Joe Biden when talking about those whose “true nature” seek Taiwanese independence. The Biden-Xi meeting took place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Saturday. “If the US cares about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in seeking Taiwanese independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra
HEALTHCARE: Following a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, Taiwanese traveling overseas for six months would no longer be able to suspend their insurance Measures allowing people to suspend National Health Insurance (NHI) services if they plan to leave the country for six months would be abolished starting Dec. 23, NHIA Director-General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) said yesterday. The decision followed the Constitutional Court’s ruling in 2022 that the regulation was unconstitutional and that it would invalidate the regulation automatically unless the NHIA amended it to conform with the Constitution. The agency would amend the regulations to remove the articles and sections that allow the suspension of NHI services, and also introduce provisional clauses for those who suspended their NHI services before Dec. 23, Shih said. According to