Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) yesterday reaffirmed his opposition to China’s “one country, two systems” formula after his previous support for President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “four musts” drew ire from pan-blue supporters.
Chiang, grandson of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), first expressed opposition to the “one country, two systems” formula during a political talk show on Thursday last week, in which he also expressed support for Tsai’s “four musts” as a basis for cross-strait relations.
Tsai in her New Year’s Day speech on Tuesday last week said that China must recognize the existence of the Republic of China (ROC); respect the values of democracy and freedom that Taiwan’s 23 million residents hold dear; resolve cross-strait differences in a peaceful and equitable manner; and engage in negotiations with the government or an institution with a mandate from the government.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
Chiang Wan-an’s support for Tsai’s position on cross-strait ties drew criticism from KMT supporters, with many attacking him on Facebook and some calling him a “separatist.”
A KMT member praising Tsai’s speech “is classic inexperience and naivety,” former KMT Central Policy Committee director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) said.
“When did Tsai Ing-wen and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ever acknowledge the existence of the ROC? Does [Beijing] require the abolition of freedom and democratic systems [as part of unification]?” he asked.
The so-called “1992 consensus” is a peaceful way for Taiwan to achieve parity with China, Alex Tsai said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Chiang Wan-an yesterday said that he supports the KMT’s definition of the “1992 consensus” that both sides of the Strait must be free to define “China” in their own way.
That freedom forms the basis of the “1992 consensus,” which is built on the foundation of the ROC Constitution and is executed through the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), he said.
While he does not agree with Tsai Ing-wen’s refusal to acknowledge the “1992 consensus,” he could not accept the “one country, two systems” formula, Chiang said.
“Taiwan is not Hong Kong,” he said, adding that most Taiwanese would not accept unification under the formula.
Whoever is president needs to follow the nation’s Constitution and protect its sovereignty, he said.
He added that regardless of who is president, they must acknowledge the existence of the ROC, protect democracy and the freedom of its citizens, and must resolve differences with China in a way that recognizes the equal legitimacy of the ROC and its institutions.
“If President Tsai refuses to accept the ‘1992 consensus’ and refuses to acknowledge its existence, I implore her to provide a specific solution for discourse with China, and not just throw around hipster slogans,” Chiang Wan-an said.
Civil society groups yesterday protested outside the Legislative Yuan, decrying Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) efforts to pass three major bills that they said would seriously harm Taiwan’s democracy, and called to oust KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁). It was the second night of the three-day “Bluebird wintertime action” protests in Taipei, with organizers announcing that 8,000 people attended. Organized by Taiwan Citizen Front, the Economic Democracy Union (EDU) and a coalition of civil groups, about 6,000 people began a demonstration in front of KMT party headquarters in Taipei on Wednesday, organizers said. For the third day, the organizers asked people to assemble
Taipei is participating in Osaka’s Festival of Lights this year, with a 3m-tall bubble tea light installation symbolizing Taiwan’s bubble tea culture. The installation is designed as a bubble tea cup and features illustrations of Taipei’s iconic landmarks, such as Taipei 101, the Red House and North Gate, as well as soup dumplings and the matchmaking deity the Old Man Under the Moon (月下老人), affectionately known as Yue Lao (月老). Taipei and Osaka have collaborated closely on tourism and culture since Taipei first participated in the festival in 2018, the Taipei City Department of Information and Tourism said. In February, Osaka represented
POOR IMPLEMENTATION: Teachers welcomed the suspension, saying that the scheme disrupted school schedules, quality of learning and the milk market A policy to offer free milk to all school-age children nationwide is to be suspended next year due to multiple problems arising from implementation of the policy, the Executive Yuan announced yesterday. The policy was designed to increase the calcium intake of school-age children in Taiwan by drinking milk, as more than 80 percent drink less than 240ml per day. The recommended amount is 480ml. It was also implemented to help Taiwanese dairy farmers counter competition from fresh milk produced in New Zealand, which is to be imported to Taiwan tariff-free next year when the Agreement Between New Zealand and
IDENTITY SHIFT: Asked to choose to identify as either Taiwanese or Chinese, 83.3 percent of respondents chose Taiwanese, while 8.4 percent chose Chinese An overwhelming majority of Taiwanese, 71.5 percent, think that Taiwan should compete in international competitions under the name “Taiwan,” a Taiwan Brain Trust survey published yesterday showed. Referring to Taiwan’s victory last month at the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12, the survey results showed that 89.1 percent of respondents said that Taiwan’s exceptional performance in sporting competitions furthers national unity. Only 18.8 percent of respondents supported Taiwanese teams’ continued use of the name “Chinese Taipei” in international sporting competitions, the survey showed. Among Taiwan’s leading political parties, the name “Team Taiwan” was supported by 91.1 percent of self-identified Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters,