Lawmakers yesterday passed the Act on Financial Technology Innovations and Experiments (金融科技創新實驗條例) in a bid to upgrade the nation’s financial sector by granting technology firms more leeway when experimenting with innovative financial services.
The act was inspired by a sandbox proposed by the UK Financial Conduct Authority for field-testing financial services by tech firms.
Firms that have passed an assessment to use the sandbox would be allowed to bypass — in part or in full — certain regulations after gaining the approval of the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the act stipulates.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The FSC is to consult responsible agencies when it wants a test financial service to be exempted from certain rules, with the exception of the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法) and the Act Against the Threats of Hacking (資恐防治法), which cannot be exempted, it says.
In addition, a review committee is to be established under the FSC to review plans.
To promote innovation, the committee is required to hire experts from the private sector for between one-third and half of its staff, with the rest composed of representatives from government agencies, the act states.
To avoid profitability being harmed by red tape, the committee is to decide within 60 days of a submission whether it qualifies for the sandbox. Approved plans would then be given an 18-month time frame within which firms would be allowed to launch trial runs of their services.
The 18-month period may be extended to no more than 36 months at the discretion of the FSC.
The review committee is to submit a report to the Legislative Yuan detailing the results of a project and which regulations should be changed within 90 days of the end of a trial, so that a new service may be put on the financial market after necessary legal amendments are approved.
People who experience financial losses as a result of their participation in a financial service test are protected by the Financial Consumer Protection Act (金融消費者保護法) and should file complaints with the Financial Ombudsman Institution.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Karen Yu (余宛如), who initiated the bill, said that the passage of the act makes Taiwan the first nation in the world to introduce a financial regulatory sandbox law.
The act would greatly increase the flexibility of financial-oriented regulations that have been limiting innovation, Yu said, adding that it would also break down barriers between sectors, so that tech and financial firms can work together seamlessly.
The sandbox model can also be applied to a variety of fields, such as the research and development of drones, she added.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Jason Hsu (許毓仁) said the three-year trial period offered by the sandbox is the longest in the world and lauded the act as “ushering in a new era for Taiwan’s financial technology.”
He said the legislation came later than some would have hoped, as the nation’s achievements in innovative financial services have trailed behind several others in the region such as Hong Kong and South Korea, but the passage of the act was “better late than never.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods