Sat, Aug 05, 2017 page3

• New policy must consider human rights: advocates

  • By Abraham Gerber / Staff Reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Human rights and environmental considerations should be incorporated into the government’s New Southbound Policy, a group of Taiwanese and Vietnamese campaigners said yesterday, proposing measures to remedy the problems revealed by a major environmental scandal.

  “The New Southbound Policy only focuses on Taiwan’s development — not the development of Southeast Asia as a whole — and it does not place any emphasis on environmental protection and societal growth. The policy needs to include these kinds of issues to make sure that investors are accountable,” Vietnamese Catholic Bishop Nguyen Thai Hop said.

  Nguyen’s Vinh diocese encompasses a swathe of the seacoast affected by a mass fish die-off last year that was linked to pollution caused by a steel plant owned by a Vietnamese subsidiary of Formosa Plastics Group.

  

  Vietnamese Bishop Nguyen Thai Hop, center, speaks about environmental protection and human rights at a news conference in Taipei yesterday.

  Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

  He made the remarks at a news conference attended by Vietnamese migrant workers, after presenting a petition to the Presidential Office, saying that stricter overseas investment regulations could have prevented the disaster and would enable the nation to differentiate itself from China.

  “This would help prevent Taiwanese firms from being targeted during anti-China riots,” he said, referring to riots in 2014 when more than 100 Taiwanese factories were attacked by people protesting against Chinese activities in the South China Sea.

  Safeguards do not need to be overly strict, as long as they are reasonable, fair and just, he said.

  Environmental Jurists Association secretary-general Lin Jen-hui (林仁惠) called for amendments to the Statute for Industrial Innovation (產業創新條例) to grant the Ministry of Economic Affairs the authority to bar Taiwanese overseas investment projects that could violate the rights of workers and people in the host nation.

  Companies should be required to submit human rights impact assessment reports along with their applications and the government should have the power to revoke investment permits of companies that are found to have reneged on their pledges, Lin said.

  PENALTY

  “Any company that violates their promises should face a fine, unlike the current situation where the government’s hands are tied,” she said.

  Covenants Watch chief executive officer Huang Yi-bee (黃怡碧) said that citizens of foreign states should be allowed to seek redress and compensation in Taiwanese courts for human rights violations committed by Taiwanese firms abroad.

  Nguyen called on the government to put pressure on Formosa Plastics to increase the compensation offered to people affected by the mass fish die-off and require the Vietnamese government to clarify how the money would be distributed, such as publicizing the amount of compensation provided to each person.

  “The US$500 million compensation, to which the Vietnamese government agreed, was not approved by the public and did not go through a court — it is a meager amount, given the number of people affected,” he said, adding that the Catholic Church is in the process of aggregating victims’ claims to estimate the amount of compensation required.

  Huang said that the church has become a conduit for the victims to express their opposition to the Vietnamese government’s handling of compensation, because many of them are Catholics and the government is unwilling to crack down on the church.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Roadside saliva tests to begin by end of the year

  • 2

    Registration for NT$10,000 to open on Nov. 5

  • 3

    MOFA rejects ‘Time’ ‘reckless leader’ label

  • 4

    Taiwan in Time: The breakfast that sparked Taiwan’s semiconductor revolution

  • 5

    NT$10,000 cash handout explainer